PPH vs. UNHW
PPH (VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF) and UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index, while UNHW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments. PPH is passively managed, while UNHW is actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PPH charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for UNHW.
Performance
PPH vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPH achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly lower than UNHW's 27.05% return.
PPH
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- 1Y
- 23.31%
- 3Y*
- 12.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.67%
- 10Y*
- 8.52%
UNHW
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 6.62%
- YTD
- 27.05%
- 6M
- 29.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PPH vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PPH VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF | 2.92% | 3.07% |
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 27.05% | 1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPH and UNHW is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | 0.22 |
PPH vs. UNHW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PPH
UNHW
Healthcare
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
PPH
UNHW
Industrials
PPH
UNHW
-
Basic Materials
PPH
-
UNHW
-
Communication Services
PPH
-
UNHW
-
Consumer Cyclical
PPH
-
UNHW
-
Consumer Defensive
PPH
-
UNHW
-
Energy
PPH
-
UNHW
-
Financial Services
PPH
-
UNHW
-
Real Estate
PPH
-
UNHW
-
Technology
PPH
-
UNHW
-
Utilities
PPH
-
UNHW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPH vs. UNHW — Risk / Return Rank
PPH
UNHW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PPH vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPH | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPH vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPH drawdown since its inception was -51.45%, which is greater than UNHW's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPH and UNHW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPH | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.45% | -32.28% | -19.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.94% | -0.45% | -4.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.29% | -11.32% | -5.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | — | — |
Volatility
PPH vs. UNHW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPH | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.66% | 48.61% | -30.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 48.61% | -33.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 48.61% | -31.63% |
PPH vs. UNHW - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPH has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPH vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison
PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than UNHW's 18.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPH VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF | 2.05% | 1.78% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 1.55% | 1.62% | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.97% | 1.92% | 2.43% | 1.93% |
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 18.13% | 2.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPH and UNHW have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PPH is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PPH is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.
UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 18.13%, compared with 2.05% for PPH.
PPH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while UNHW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PPH and 0.99% for UNHW.
Find the right allocation for PPH and UNHW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer