PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPH vs. UNHW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPH vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPH achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly lower than UNHW's 15.08% return.


PPH

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.56%
YTD
-0.76%
6M
2.14%
1Y
17.87%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
7.46%

UNHW

1D
0.06%
1M
2.06%
YTD
15.08%
6M
11.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPH vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PPH
VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF
-0.76%2.92%
UNHW
Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF
15.08%-3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PPH and UNHW is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.20

PPH vs. UNHW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PPH
UNHW

Healthcare

100.0%
33.4%

Industrials

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

PPH
100.0%
UNHW
33.4%

Industrials

PPH
0.1%
UNHW

-

Basic Materials

PPH

-

UNHW

-

Communication Services

PPH

-

UNHW

-

Consumer Cyclical

PPH

-

UNHW

-

Consumer Defensive

PPH

-

UNHW

-

Energy

PPH

-

UNHW

-

Financial Services

PPH

-

UNHW

-

Real Estate

PPH

-

UNHW

-

Technology

PPH

-

UNHW

-

Utilities

PPH

-

UNHW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPH vs. UNHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPH
PPH Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPH Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPH Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

UNHW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPH vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPHUNHWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.88

PPH vs. UNHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPHUNHWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.50

-0.20

Drawdowns

PPH vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPH drawdown since its inception was -51.45%, which is greater than UNHW's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPH and UNHW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPHUNHWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.45%

-32.28%

-19.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.34%

-7.06%

-1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.31%

-12.48%

-4.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.61%

Volatility

PPH vs. UNHW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPHUNHWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.26%

49.81%

-32.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.07%

49.81%

-34.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

49.81%

-32.85%

PPH vs. UNHW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPH has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPH vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison

PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than UNHW's 17.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPH
VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF
2.12%1.78%1.98%2.09%1.55%1.62%1.66%1.77%1.97%1.92%2.43%1.93%
UNHW
Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF
17.33%2.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPH and UNHW have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PPH is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PPH is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.

UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 17.33%, compared with 2.12% for PPH.

PPH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while UNHW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PPH and 0.99% for UNHW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPH and UNHW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer