PPH vs. MLI
PPH (VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index, while MLI (Mueller Industries, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, PPH returned 8.39%/yr vs 26.81%/yr for MLI. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PPH vs. MLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPH achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly lower than MLI's 20.69% return. Over the past 10 years, PPH has underperformed MLI with an annualized return of 8.39%, while MLI has yielded a comparatively higher 26.81% annualized return.
PPH
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 2.96%
- 6M
- 3.80%
- 1Y
- 18.69%
- 3Y*
- 12.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.39%
MLI
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 20.69%
- 6M
- 20.88%
- 1Y
- 87.45%
- 3Y*
- 52.10%
- 5Y*
- 45.38%
- 10Y*
- 26.81%
PPH vs. MLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPH VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF | 2.96% | 22.00% | 8.05% | 6.95% | 2.64% | 17.79% | 5.49% | 19.39% | -5.89% | 15.23% |
MLI Mueller Industries, Inc. | 20.69% | 46.29% | 70.51% | 62.38% | 1.05% | 70.95% | 12.30% | 37.79% | -33.10% | -2.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPH and MLI is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2000 | 0.39 |
The correlation between PPH and MLI shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPH vs. MLI — Risk / Return Rank
PPH
MLI
PPH vs. MLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPH | MLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.50 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 3.94 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.30 | 10.92 | -6.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPH vs. MLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPH drawdown since its inception was -51.45%, smaller than the maximum MLI drawdown of -61.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPH and MLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPH | MLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.45% | -61.72% | +10.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.76% | -22.33% | +11.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.06% | -27.79% | +9.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.26% | -27.79% | +7.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.70% | -52.95% | +23.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.90% | -1.93% | -2.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.29% | -16.04% | -1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | 8.03% | -3.58% |
Volatility
PPH vs. MLI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) is 5.95%, while Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) has a volatility of 10.51%. This indicates that PPH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPH | MLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.95% | 10.51% | -4.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.18% | 25.79% | -13.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.66% | 30.06% | -12.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.14% | 33.07% | -17.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 35.79% | -18.79% |
Dividends
PPH vs. MLI - Dividend Comparison
PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than MLI's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLI Mueller Industries, Inc. | 0.87% | 0.87% | 1.01% | 1.27% | 1.69% | 0.88% | 1.14% | 1.26% | 1.71% | 9.60% | 0.94% | 1.11% |
PPH VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF | 2.05% | 1.78% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 1.55% | 1.62% | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.97% | 1.92% | 2.43% | 1.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPH and MLI have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLI has higher volatility (10.51%) compared to PPH (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPH dropped -51.45% vs MLI's -61.72%.
MLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPH and MLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer