PPH vs. HGER
PPH (VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF) and HGER (Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index, while HGER is a Commodities fund tracking the Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PPH returned 14.50%/yr vs 18.60%/yr for HGER. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PPH charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for HGER.
Performance
PPH vs. HGER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPH achieves a 6.93% return, which is significantly lower than HGER's 23.17% return.
PPH
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- 25.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.50%
- 5Y*
- 10.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.09%
HGER
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 20.50%
- YTD
- 23.17%
- 1Y
- 31.96%
- 3Y*
- 18.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PPH vs. HGER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPH VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF | 6.93% | 22.00% | 8.05% | 6.95% | 2.03% |
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF | 23.17% | 20.08% | 9.25% | 1.93% | 9.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPH and HGER is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022 | 0.00 |
The correlation between PPH and HGER shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPH vs. HGER — Risk / Return Rank
PPH
HGER
PPH vs. HGER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPH | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.35 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 2.39 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.52 | 8.73 | -3.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPH vs. HGER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPH drawdown since its inception was -51.45%, which is greater than HGER's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPH and HGER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPH | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.45% | -23.31% | -28.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.76% | -14.04% | +3.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.06% | -14.04% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -8.66% | +6.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.26% | -7.71% | -9.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 3.83% | +0.61% |
Volatility
PPH vs. HGER - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) at 5.75%. This indicates that PPH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HGER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPH | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.27% | 5.75% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.99% | 15.35% | -2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.27% | 17.37% | +0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.31% | 17.67% | -2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 17.67% | -0.68% |
PPH vs. HGER - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPH has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than HGER's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPH vs. HGER - Dividend Comparison
PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than HGER's 5.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF | 5.75% | 7.09% | 3.28% | 7.24% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PPH VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF | 2.00% | 1.78% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 1.55% | 1.62% | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.97% | 1.92% | 2.43% | 1.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPH and HGER have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PPH has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to HGER (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPH dropped -51.45% vs HGER's -23.31%.
On 3-year performance, HGER leads with 18.60% vs 14.50% for PPH. On fees, PPH is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, HGER has been the lower-risk option at 5.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HGER has performed better with a 18.60% return vs 14.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PPH is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for HGER.
HGER has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 2.00% for PPH.
PPH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while HGER is Commodities. PPH tracks MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index, while HGER tracks Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PPH and 0.68% for HGER.
HGER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPH and HGER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer