PPFB.DE vs. XLM-USD
PPFB.DE (iShares Physical Gold ETC) is Gold fund tracking the Gold, while XLM-USD (Stellar) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 3 years, PPFB.DE returned 28.05%/yr vs 30.86%/yr for XLM-USD. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
PPFB.DE vs. XLM-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PPFB.DE is traded in EUR, while XLM-USD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLM-USD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPFB.DE achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly higher than XLM-USD's -3.97% return.
PPFB.DE
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- 29.94%
- 3Y*
- 28.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLM-USD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 17.98%
- YTD
- -3.97%
- 6M
- -19.29%
- 1Y
- -27.36%
- 3Y*
- 30.86%
- 5Y*
- -10.35%
- 10Y*
- 60.04%
PPFB.DE vs. XLM-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 2.74% | 49.11% | 34.17% | 9.42% | 7.03% | 2.86% |
XLM-USD Stellar | -3.97% | -46.72% | 172.83% | 73.91% | -71.16% | 14.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPFB.DE and XLM-USD is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPFB.DE vs. XLM-USD — Risk / Return Rank
PPFB.DE
XLM-USD
PPFB.DE vs. XLM-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and Stellar (XLM-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPFB.DE | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.00 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | -0.38 | +2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | -0.55 | +5.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPFB.DE vs. XLM-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.60%, smaller than the maximum XLM-USD drawdown of -95.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPFB.DE and XLM-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPFB.DE | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.60% | -95.92% | +79.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.60% | -71.21% | +54.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.60% | -76.64% | +60.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -81.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -95.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.00% | -77.64% | +62.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -69.84% | +65.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.55% | 50.28% | -43.73% |
Volatility
PPFB.DE vs. XLM-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) is 5.11%, while Stellar (XLM-USD) has a volatility of 38.95%. This indicates that PPFB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLM-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPFB.DE | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 38.95% | -33.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.18% | 56.34% | -36.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.12% | 70.67% | -47.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 73.08% | -56.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 127.73% | -111.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPFB.DE and XLM-USD have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PPFB.DE and XLM-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer