PPFB.DE vs. LRCX
PPFB.DE (iShares Physical Gold ETC) is Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, PPFB.DE returned 28.05%/yr vs 77.73%/yr for LRCX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PPFB.DE vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PPFB.DE is traded in EUR, while LRCX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LRCX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPFB.DE achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 117.84% return.
PPFB.DE
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -4.00%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- 31.35%
- 3Y*
- 28.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRCX
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 25.73%
- YTD
- 117.84%
- 6M
- 132.17%
- 1Y
- 303.82%
- 3Y*
- 77.73%
- 5Y*
- 44.53%
- 10Y*
- 47.76%
PPFB.DE vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 2.74% | 49.11% | 34.17% | 9.42% | 7.03% | 2.86% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 117.84% | 110.78% | -0.70% | 82.97% | -37.05% | 22.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPFB.DE and LRCX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021 | 0.01 |
The correlation between PPFB.DE and LRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPFB.DE vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank
PPFB.DE
LRCX
PPFB.DE vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPFB.DE | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.64 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 16.38 | -14.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | 55.94 | -51.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPFB.DE vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.60%, smaller than the maximum LRCX drawdown of -69.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPFB.DE and LRCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPFB.DE | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.60% | -69.81% | +53.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.60% | -18.68% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.60% | -47.73% | +31.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.00% | 0.00% | -15.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -17.78% | +13.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.55% | 5.46% | +1.09% |
Volatility
PPFB.DE vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) is 5.11%, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a volatility of 20.69%. This indicates that PPFB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPFB.DE | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 20.69% | -15.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.18% | 42.18% | -22.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.12% | 51.71% | -28.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 45.70% | -29.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 44.62% | -28.49% |
Dividends
PPFB.DE vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
PPFB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.28% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPFB.DE and LRCX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PPFB.DE and LRCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer