PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPA vs. XDEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPA vs. XDEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PPA

1D
-1.74%
1M
3.19%
YTD
8.54%
6M
13.46%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
28.92%
5Y*
17.82%
10Y*
17.38%

XDEF

1D
-2.06%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPA vs. XDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PPA and XDEF is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026

0.67

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPA vs. XDEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPA
PPA Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEF
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPA vs. XDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPAXDEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.68

PPA vs. XDEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPAXDEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

-0.64

+1.29

Drawdowns

PPA vs. XDEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPA drawdown since its inception was -57.37%, smaller than the maximum XDEF drawdown of -99.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPA and XDEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPAXDEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.37%

-99.30%

+41.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.40%

-99.26%

+90.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.18%

-70.45%

+61.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.69%

Volatility

PPA vs. XDEF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPAXDEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.03%

157.63%

-138.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.49%

157.63%

-139.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.64%

157.63%

-136.99%

PPA vs. XDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEF's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPA vs. XDEF - Dividend Comparison

PPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while XDEF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.39%0.42%0.61%0.67%0.83%0.59%0.88%0.95%0.90%0.67%1.70%1.41%
XDEF
Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPA and XDEF have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.

PPA has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for XDEF.

PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index, while XDEF tracks STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PPA and 0.35% for XDEF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPA and XDEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer