PPA vs. XDEF
PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) and XDEF (Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - PPA tracks the SPADE Defense Index while XDEF tracks the STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PPA charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XDEF.
Performance
PPA vs. XDEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PPA
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 13.46%
- 1Y
- 26.57%
- 3Y*
- 28.92%
- 5Y*
- 17.82%
- 10Y*
- 17.38%
XDEF
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PPA vs. XDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 5.50% |
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | -99.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPA and XDEF is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPA vs. XDEF — Risk / Return Rank
PPA
XDEF
PPA vs. XDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PPA | XDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.68 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PPA | XDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | -0.64 | +1.29 |
Drawdowns
PPA vs. XDEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPA drawdown since its inception was -57.37%, smaller than the maximum XDEF drawdown of -99.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPA and XDEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPA | XDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.37% | -99.30% | +41.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.40% | -99.26% | +90.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.18% | -70.45% | +61.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.69% | — | — |
Volatility
PPA vs. XDEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPA | XDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.03% | 157.63% | -138.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.49% | 157.63% | -139.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.64% | 157.63% | -136.99% |
PPA vs. XDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEF's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPA vs. XDEF - Dividend Comparison
PPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while XDEF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.39% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 0.59% | 0.88% | 0.95% | 0.90% | 0.67% | 1.70% | 1.41% |
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPA and XDEF have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.
PPA has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for XDEF.
PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index, while XDEF tracks STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PPA and 0.35% for XDEF.
Find the right allocation for PPA and XDEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer