PPA vs. IAK
PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) and IAK (iShares U.S. Insurance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the SPADE Defense Index, while IAK is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PPA returned 17.72%/yr vs 12.67%/yr for IAK. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PPA charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IAK.
Performance
PPA vs. IAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPA achieves a 11.20% return, which is significantly higher than IAK's 1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PPA has outperformed IAK with an annualized return of 17.72%, while IAK has yielded a comparatively lower 12.67% annualized return.
PPA
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 6M
- 13.03%
- 1Y
- 28.73%
- 3Y*
- 28.86%
- 5Y*
- 18.41%
- 10Y*
- 17.72%
IAK
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
PPA vs. IAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 11.20% | 37.15% | 25.28% | 18.41% | 9.52% | 7.09% | 0.45% | 39.63% | -7.51% | 30.10% |
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 1.11% | 9.50% | 28.25% | 11.28% | 11.33% | 26.84% | -2.86% | 25.94% | -11.48% | 14.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPA and IAK is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PPA and IAK has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PPA vs. IAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PPA
IAK
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
PPA
IAK
-
Technology
PPA
IAK
-
Communication Services
PPA
IAK
-
Financial Services
PPA
IAK
Basic Materials
PPA
-
IAK
-
Consumer Cyclical
PPA
-
IAK
-
Consumer Defensive
PPA
-
IAK
-
Energy
PPA
-
IAK
-
Healthcare
PPA
-
IAK
Real Estate
PPA
-
IAK
-
Utilities
PPA
-
IAK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPA vs. IAK — Risk / Return Rank
PPA
IAK
PPA vs. IAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPA | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.06 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 0.57 | +1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.94 | 1.27 | +4.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPA vs. IAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPA drawdown since its inception was -57.37%, smaller than the maximum IAK drawdown of -77.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPA and IAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPA | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.37% | -77.38% | +20.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | -7.62% | -6.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.24% | -11.58% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.37% | -14.76% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.92% | -44.95% | +1.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.15% | -0.23% | -5.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.18% | -16.11% | +6.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.85% | 3.41% | +1.44% |
Volatility
PPA vs. IAK - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a higher volatility of 8.91% compared to iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) at 5.49%. This indicates that PPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPA | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.91% | 5.49% | +3.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.06% | 10.75% | +6.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.04% | 15.10% | +4.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 18.14% | +0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 20.92% | -0.19% |
PPA vs. IAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IAK's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPA vs. IAK - Dividend Comparison
PPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than IAK's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 2.60% | 1.69% | 1.49% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 2.26% | 2.07% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.62% |
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.38% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 0.59% | 0.88% | 0.95% | 0.90% | 0.67% | 1.70% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPA and IAK have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PPA has higher volatility (8.91%) compared to IAK (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPA dropped -57.37% vs IAK's -77.38%.
On 10-year performance, PPA leads with 17.72% vs 12.67% for IAK. On fees, IAK is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, IAK has been the lower-risk option at 5.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PPA has performed better with a 17.72% return vs 12.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAK is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.
IAK has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.38% for PPA.
PPA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while IAK is Financials Equities. PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index, while IAK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PPA and 0.43% for IAK.
PPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPA and IAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer