PPA vs. GDX
PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the SPADE Defense Index, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PPA returned 17.72%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for GDX. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PPA charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
PPA vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPA achieves a 11.20% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -6.69% return. Over the past 10 years, PPA has outperformed GDX with an annualized return of 17.72%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.29% annualized return.
PPA
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 6M
- 13.03%
- 1Y
- 28.73%
- 3Y*
- 28.86%
- 5Y*
- 18.41%
- 10Y*
- 17.72%
GDX
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -16.83%
- YTD
- -6.69%
- 6M
- -5.89%
- 1Y
- 50.59%
- 3Y*
- 38.96%
- 5Y*
- 17.51%
- 10Y*
- 13.29%
PPA vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 11.20% | 37.15% | 25.28% | 18.41% | 9.52% | 7.09% | 0.45% | 39.63% | -7.51% | 30.10% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -6.69% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPA and GDX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2006 | 0.22 |
The correlation between PPA and GDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (10 years) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PPA vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PPA
GDX
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
PPA
GDX
-
Technology
PPA
GDX
-
Communication Services
PPA
GDX
-
Financial Services
PPA
GDX
-
Basic Materials
PPA
-
GDX
Consumer Cyclical
PPA
-
GDX
-
Consumer Defensive
PPA
-
GDX
-
Energy
PPA
-
GDX
-
Healthcare
PPA
-
GDX
-
Real Estate
PPA
-
GDX
-
Utilities
PPA
-
GDX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPA vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
PPA
GDX
PPA vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPA | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.21 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 1.40 | +0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.94 | 3.87 | +2.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPA vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPA drawdown since its inception was -57.37%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPA and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPA | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.37% | -80.34% | +22.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | -36.28% | +22.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.24% | -36.28% | +21.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.37% | -46.51% | +28.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.92% | -49.79% | +5.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.15% | -30.91% | +24.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.18% | -40.41% | +31.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.85% | 13.11% | -8.26% |
Volatility
PPA vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) is 8.91%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 17.20%. This indicates that PPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPA | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.91% | 17.20% | -8.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.06% | 39.15% | -22.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.04% | 46.89% | -26.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 36.74% | -18.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 37.34% | -16.61% |
PPA vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPA vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
PPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than GDX's 0.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.79% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.38% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 0.59% | 0.88% | 0.95% | 0.90% | 0.67% | 1.70% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPA and GDX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (17.20%) compared to PPA (8.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPA dropped -57.37% vs GDX's -80.34%.
On 10-year performance, PPA leads with 17.72% vs 13.29% for GDX. On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, PPA has been the lower-risk option at 8.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PPA has performed better with a 17.72% return vs 13.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.
GDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.38% for PPA.
PPA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while GDX is Gold. PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PPA and 0.51% for GDX.
PPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPA and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer