PPA vs. DRNZ
PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) and DRNZ (REX Drone ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - PPA tracks the SPADE Defense Index while DRNZ tracks the VettaFi Drone Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PPA charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRNZ.
Performance
PPA vs. DRNZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPA achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly lower than DRNZ's 27.64% return.
PPA
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- 5.79%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 14.31%
- 1Y
- 28.82%
- 3Y*
- 30.12%
- 5Y*
- 18.31%
- 10Y*
- 17.53%
DRNZ
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- 27.64%
- 6M
- 32.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PPA vs. DRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 10.82% | -1.25% |
DRNZ REX Drone ETF | 27.64% | -10.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPA and DRNZ is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPA vs. DRNZ — Risk / Return Rank
PPA
DRNZ
PPA vs. DRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and REX Drone ETF (DRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PPA | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.14 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PPA | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.48 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
PPA vs. DRNZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPA drawdown since its inception was -57.37%, which is greater than DRNZ's maximum drawdown of -24.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPA and DRNZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPA | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.37% | -24.52% | -32.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.47% | -5.32% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.18% | -11.08% | +1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.70% | — | — |
Volatility
PPA vs. DRNZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPA | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.05% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.12% | 50.73% | -31.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.51% | 50.73% | -32.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.64% | 50.73% | -30.09% |
PPA vs. DRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than DRNZ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPA vs. DRNZ - Dividend Comparison
PPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, while DRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRNZ REX Drone ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.38% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 0.59% | 0.88% | 0.95% | 0.90% | 0.67% | 1.70% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPA and DRNZ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PPA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PPA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRNZ.
PPA has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for DRNZ.
PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index, while DRNZ tracks VettaFi Drone Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PPA and 0.65% for DRNZ.
Find the right allocation for PPA and DRNZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer