PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POWR vs. UPGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

POWR vs. UPGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POWR achieves a 12.12% return, which is significantly higher than UPGR's 0.49% return.


POWR

1D
0.77%
1M
-3.78%
6M
6.76%
YTD
12.12%
1Y
16.38%
3Y*
7.49%
5Y*
15.95%
10Y*
8.36%
ALL TIME*
4.05%

UPGR

1D
-0.96%
1M
-9.75%
6M
-8.21%
YTD
0.49%
1Y
28.76%
3Y*
-0.42%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.98M$6.98M$7.47M
$4.45K$12.30K$33.82K

POWR vs. UPGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
POWR
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF
12.12%10.81%-1.30%3.87%
UPGR
Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF
0.49%35.25%-14.72%-15.29%

Correlation

The correlation between POWR and UPGR is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023

0.43

The correlation between POWR and UPGR shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

POWR vs. UPGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
POWR
UPGR

Utilities

58.2%
8.7%

Industrials

23.7%
54.6%

Energy

12.4%
1.6%

Technology

5.4%
10.9%

Basic Materials

0.1%
11.8%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.8%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

POWR
58.2%
UPGR
8.7%

Industrials

POWR
23.7%
UPGR
54.6%

Energy

POWR
12.4%
UPGR
1.6%

Technology

POWR
5.4%
UPGR
10.9%

Basic Materials

POWR
0.1%
UPGR
11.8%

Communication Services

POWR

-

UPGR

-

Consumer Cyclical

POWR

-

UPGR
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

POWR

-

UPGR
2.8%

Financial Services

POWR

-

UPGR
0.2%

Healthcare

POWR

-

UPGR

-

Real Estate

POWR

-

UPGR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POWR vs. UPGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

POWR
POWR Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
POWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
POWR Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
POWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
POWR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

UPGR
UPGR Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
UPGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPGR Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
UPGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPGR Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

POWR vs. UPGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


POWRUPGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.15

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

1.13

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.38

3.00

+2.38

POWR vs. UPGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POWR Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the UPGR Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POWR and UPGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

POWR vs. UPGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POWR drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than UPGR's maximum drawdown of -46.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWR and UPGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POWRUPGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.98%

-46.60%

-19.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.77%

-22.71%

+12.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.14%

-43.58%

+20.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.78%

-19.78%

+13.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.99%

-20.11%

+2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

8.51%

-5.72%

Volatility

POWR vs. UPGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) is 5.12%, while Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) has a volatility of 10.88%. This indicates that POWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POWRUPGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

10.88%

-5.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.54%

24.18%

-10.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.26%

32.98%

-15.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.93%

31.08%

-8.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.50%

31.08%

-5.58%

POWR vs. UPGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

POWR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than UPGR's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

POWR vs. UPGR - Dividend Comparison

POWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than UPGR's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
POWR
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF
5.75%7.56%4.36%4.16%4.82%3.94%3.96%5.71%3.17%3.11%2.75%3.42%
UPGR
Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF
0.32%0.39%1.16%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


POWR and UPGR have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UPGR has higher volatility (10.88%) compared to POWR (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWR dropped -65.98% vs UPGR's -46.60%.

On 3-year performance, POWR leads with 7.49% vs -0.42% for UPGR. On fees, UPGR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, POWR has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, POWR has performed better with a 7.49% return vs -0.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UPGR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for POWR.

POWR has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 0.32% for UPGR.

POWR tracks S&P U.S. Power Infrastructure Select Index, while UPGR tracks Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWR and 0.35% for UPGR.

POWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POWR and UPGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer