POWR vs. UPGR
POWR (iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF) and UPGR (Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF) are both Infrastructure Equities funds - POWR tracks the S&P U.S. Power Infrastructure Select Index while UPGR tracks the Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, POWR returned 7.49%/yr vs -0.42%/yr for UPGR. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. POWR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for UPGR.
Performance
POWR vs. UPGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWR achieves a 12.12% return, which is significantly higher than UPGR's 0.49% return.
POWR
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- 6M
- 6.76%
- YTD
- 12.12%
- 1Y
- 16.38%
- 3Y*
- 7.49%
- 5Y*
- 15.95%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.05%
UPGR
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -9.75%
- 6M
- -8.21%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 28.76%
- 3Y*
- -0.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.98M | $6.98M | $7.47M | |
| $4.45K | $12.30K | $33.82K |
POWR vs. UPGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 12.12% | 10.81% | -1.30% | 3.87% |
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF | 0.49% | 35.25% | -14.72% | -15.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWR and UPGR is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023 | 0.43 |
The correlation between POWR and UPGR shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
POWR vs. UPGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
POWR
UPGR
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
POWR
UPGR
Industrials
POWR
UPGR
Energy
POWR
UPGR
Technology
POWR
UPGR
Basic Materials
POWR
UPGR
Communication Services
POWR
-
UPGR
-
Consumer Cyclical
POWR
-
UPGR
Consumer Defensive
POWR
-
UPGR
Financial Services
POWR
-
UPGR
Healthcare
POWR
-
UPGR
-
Real Estate
POWR
-
UPGR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWR vs. UPGR — Risk / Return Rank
POWR
UPGR
POWR vs. UPGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POWR | UPGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.15 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.13 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.38 | 3.00 | +2.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POWR vs. UPGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWR drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than UPGR's maximum drawdown of -46.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWR and UPGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWR | UPGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.98% | -46.60% | -19.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.77% | -22.71% | +12.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.14% | -43.58% | +20.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.78% | -19.78% | +13.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.99% | -20.11% | +2.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 8.51% | -5.72% |
Volatility
POWR vs. UPGR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) is 5.12%, while Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) has a volatility of 10.88%. This indicates that POWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWR | UPGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 10.88% | -5.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.54% | 24.18% | -10.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.26% | 32.98% | -15.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 31.08% | -8.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.50% | 31.08% | -5.58% |
POWR vs. UPGR - Expense Ratio Comparison
POWR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than UPGR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
POWR vs. UPGR - Dividend Comparison
POWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than UPGR's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 5.75% | 7.56% | 4.36% | 4.16% | 4.82% | 3.94% | 3.96% | 5.71% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.75% | 3.42% |
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF | 0.32% | 0.39% | 1.16% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POWR and UPGR have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UPGR has higher volatility (10.88%) compared to POWR (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWR dropped -65.98% vs UPGR's -46.60%.
On 3-year performance, POWR leads with 7.49% vs -0.42% for UPGR. On fees, UPGR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, POWR has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, POWR has performed better with a 7.49% return vs -0.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UPGR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for POWR.
POWR has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 0.32% for UPGR.
POWR tracks S&P U.S. Power Infrastructure Select Index, while UPGR tracks Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWR and 0.35% for UPGR.
POWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POWR and UPGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer