POWR vs. JXI
POWR (iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF) and JXI (iShares Global Utilities ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds from iShares. POWR is actively managed, while JXI is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, POWR returned 8.66%/yr vs 9.05%/yr for JXI. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. POWR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for JXI.
Performance
POWR vs. JXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWR achieves a 18.53% return, which is significantly higher than JXI's 5.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with POWR having a 8.66% annualized return and JXI not far ahead at 9.05%.
POWR
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- 18.53%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 28.87%
- 3Y*
- 12.09%
- 5Y*
- 15.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
JXI
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -5.08%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 4.72%
- 1Y
- 15.41%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.24%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
POWR vs. JXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 18.53% | 10.81% | -1.30% | 3.66% | 42.54% | 42.03% | -28.30% | 8.44% | -11.74% | 9.69% |
JXI iShares Global Utilities ETF | 5.42% | 25.91% | 13.14% | 0.63% | -4.17% | 10.88% | 5.19% | 23.94% | 2.31% | 14.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWR and JXI is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2012 | 0.33 |
The correlation between POWR and JXI shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (10 years) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
POWR vs. JXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
POWR
JXI
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
POWR
JXI
Industrials
POWR
JXI
Energy
POWR
JXI
Technology
POWR
JXI
-
Basic Materials
POWR
JXI
-
Communication Services
POWR
-
JXI
-
Consumer Cyclical
POWR
-
JXI
-
Consumer Defensive
POWR
-
JXI
-
Financial Services
POWR
-
JXI
-
Healthcare
POWR
-
JXI
-
Real Estate
POWR
-
JXI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWR vs. JXI — Risk / Return Rank
POWR
JXI
POWR vs. JXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and iShares Global Utilities ETF (JXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POWR | JXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 1.20 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.41 | 1.65 | +0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.21 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.85 | 1.91 | +2.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.19 | 6.26 | +5.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POWR | JXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.20 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.60 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.53 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.33 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
POWR vs. JXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWR drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than JXI's maximum drawdown of -50.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWR and JXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWR | JXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.98% | -50.23% | -15.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.98% | -8.09% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.14% | -16.29% | -6.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.09% | -22.45% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.42% | -34.20% | -29.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -7.26% | +5.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -12.82% | -5.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 2.47% | -0.09% |
Volatility
POWR vs. JXI - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to iShares Global Utilities ETF (JXI) at 4.85%. This indicates that POWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWR | JXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 4.85% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | 10.45% | +1.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.65% | 12.89% | +3.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 15.39% | +7.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.62% | 17.01% | +8.61% |
POWR vs. JXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
POWR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than JXI's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
POWR vs. JXI - Dividend Comparison
POWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, more than JXI's 2.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JXI iShares Global Utilities ETF | 2.43% | 2.56% | 3.02% | 3.58% | 3.13% | 2.78% | 2.65% | 3.43% | 3.16% | 3.62% | 4.77% | 3.78% |
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 6.67% | 7.56% | 4.36% | 4.16% | 4.82% | 3.94% | 3.96% | 5.71% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.75% | 3.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POWR and JXI have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POWR has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to JXI (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWR dropped -65.98% vs JXI's -50.23%.
On 10-year performance, JXI leads with 9.05% vs 8.66% for POWR. On fees, POWR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, JXI has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JXI has performed better with a 9.05% return vs 8.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
POWR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for JXI.
POWR has the higher dividend yield at 6.67%, compared with 2.43% for JXI.
Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWR and 0.46% for JXI.
POWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POWR and JXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer