PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JXI vs. TIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JXI vs. TIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Utilities ETF (JXI) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JXI achieves a 7.74% return, which is significantly higher than TIP's 0.78% return. Over the past 10 years, JXI has outperformed TIP with an annualized return of 9.45%, while TIP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.43% annualized return.


JXI

1D
0.44%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
7.74%
6M
8.86%
1Y
18.92%
3Y*
15.69%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*
9.45%

TIP

1D
-0.41%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
0.78%
6M
0.90%
1Y
3.46%
3Y*
3.53%
5Y*
0.79%
10Y*
2.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JXI vs. TIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JXI
iShares Global Utilities ETF
7.74%25.91%13.14%0.63%-4.17%10.88%5.19%23.94%2.31%14.79%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
0.78%6.77%1.65%3.80%-12.26%5.68%10.84%8.35%-1.42%2.92%

Correlation

The correlation between JXI and TIP is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2006

0.05

Over the past year, JXI and TIP have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JXI vs. TIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JXI
JXI Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
JXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
JXI Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
JXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
JXI Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

TIP
TIP Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIP Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
TIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIP Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JXI vs. TIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Utilities ETF (JXI) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JXITIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.18

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

1.76

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.80

5.20

+1.61

JXI vs. TIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JXI Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the TIP Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JXI and TIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JXI vs. TIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JXI drawdown since its inception was -50.23%, which is greater than TIP's maximum drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JXI and TIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JXITIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.23%

-14.57%

-35.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.09%

-1.98%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.29%

-4.54%

-11.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.45%

-14.51%

-7.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.20%

-14.51%

-19.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.21%

-1.07%

-4.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.80%

-3.43%

-9.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

0.67%

+2.12%

Volatility

JXI vs. TIP - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Utilities ETF (JXI) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) at 1.22%. This indicates that JXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JXITIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

1.22%

+3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.61%

2.47%

+8.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.01%

3.45%

+9.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.39%

6.20%

+9.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

5.74%

+11.28%

JXI vs. TIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than TIP's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

JXI vs. TIP - Dividend Comparison

JXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than TIP's 3.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JXI
iShares Global Utilities ETF
2.45%2.56%3.02%3.58%3.13%2.78%2.65%3.43%3.16%3.62%4.77%3.78%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
3.79%3.46%2.52%2.73%6.96%4.28%1.17%1.75%2.71%2.07%1.48%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


JXI and TIP have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JXI has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to TIP (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JXI dropped -50.23% vs TIP's -14.57%.

On 10-year performance, JXI leads with 9.45% vs 2.43% for TIP. On fees, TIP is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TIP has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JXI has performed better with a 9.45% return vs 2.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TIP is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for JXI.

TIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 2.45% for JXI.

JXI is categorized as Utilities Equities, while TIP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. JXI tracks S&P Global Utilities Index, while TIP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for JXI and 0.18% for TIP.

JXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JXI and TIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer