POWR vs. IBIT
POWR (iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - POWR is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. POWR is actively managed, while IBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, POWR returned 28.87% vs -38.74% for IBIT. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. POWR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
POWR vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWR achieves a 18.53% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.
POWR
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- 18.53%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 28.87%
- 3Y*
- 12.09%
- 5Y*
- 15.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -18.50%
- YTD
- -25.48%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -38.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POWR vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 18.53% | 10.81% | 0.54% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -25.48% | -6.41% | 99.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWR and IBIT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWR vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
POWR
IBIT
POWR vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POWR | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.86 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.85 | -0.79 | +5.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.19 | -1.36 | +13.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POWR | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | -0.89 | +2.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.30 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
POWR vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWR drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWR and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWR | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.98% | -49.36% | -16.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.98% | -49.36% | +43.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -48.10% | +46.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -16.02% | -2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 28.44% | -26.06% |
Volatility
POWR vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) is 5.80%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that POWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWR | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 9.50% | -3.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | 34.44% | -22.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.65% | 43.73% | -27.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 50.19% | -27.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.62% | 50.19% | -24.57% |
POWR vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
POWR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
POWR vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
POWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 6.67% | 7.56% | 4.36% | 4.16% | 4.82% | 3.94% | 3.96% | 5.71% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.75% | 3.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POWR and IBIT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to POWR (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWR dropped -65.98% vs IBIT's -49.36%.
On 1-year performance, POWR leads with 28.87% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, POWR has been the lower-risk option at 5.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, POWR has performed better with a 28.87% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for POWR.
POWR has the higher dividend yield at 6.67%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
POWR is categorized as Utilities Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWR and 0.25% for IBIT.
POWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POWR and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer