PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
POWR vs. FPWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

POWR vs. FPWR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

POWR (iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF) and FPWR (First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, POWR returned 14.68%/yr vs 12.46%/yr for FPWR. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. POWR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for FPWR.

Performance

POWR vs. FPWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POWR achieves a 17.55% return, which is significantly higher than FPWR's 14.10% return.

POWR

1D
-1.96%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
17.55%
6M
16.63%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
12.24%
5Y*
14.68%
10Y*
8.74%

FPWR

1D
0.73%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
14.10%
6M
14.06%
1Y
20.93%
3Y*
18.24%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POWR vs. FPWR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
POWR
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF		17.55%10.81%-1.30%3.66%42.54%42.03%-28.30%9.86%
FPWR
First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF		14.10%16.78%22.60%-3.36%5.28%12.26%8.98%5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between POWR and FPWR is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2019

0.41

POWR vs. FPWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
POWR
FPWR

Utilities

45.6%
51.7%

Industrials

33.0%
6.7%

Energy

11.0%
30.0%

Technology

9.5%

-

Basic Materials

1.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

1.7%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

POWR
45.6%
FPWR
51.7%

Industrials

POWR
33.0%
FPWR
6.7%

Energy

POWR
11.0%
FPWR
30.0%

Technology

POWR
9.5%
FPWR

-

Basic Materials

POWR
1.0%
FPWR

-

Communication Services

POWR

-

FPWR

-

Consumer Cyclical

POWR

-

FPWR

-

Consumer Defensive

POWR

-

FPWR

-

Financial Services

POWR

-

FPWR
1.7%

Healthcare

POWR

-

FPWR

-

Real Estate

POWR

-

FPWR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF

First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF

Often compared with POWR:
POWR vs. GRIDPOWR vs. AIPOPOWR vs. XLUPOWR vs. PAVEPOWR vs. ZAPPOWR vs. VPUPOWR vs. XLUI
Often compared with FPWR:
FPWR vs. UTESFPWR vs. XLUFPWR vs. BILTFPWR vs. ELFYFPWR vs. GLIXFPWR vs. ECLNFPWR vs. FDL

Return for Risk

POWR vs. FPWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
POWR
POWR Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
POWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
POWR Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
POWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
POWR Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
FPWR
FPWR Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FPWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPWR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FPWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPWR Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POWR vs. FPWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

POWRFPWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.25
2.00

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.79
2.89

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.35

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

4.19

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.63

10.54

-1.91

POWR vs. FPWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POWR Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the FPWR Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POWR and FPWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

POWR vs. FPWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POWR drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than FPWR's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWR and FPWR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

POWRFPWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.98%

-32.28%

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.09%

-5.02%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.14%

-14.68%

-8.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.09%

-19.88%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.42%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-1.98%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.09%

-4.98%

-13.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

1.99%

+0.46%

Volatility

POWR vs. FPWR - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR) at 3.60%. This indicates that POWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

POWRFPWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

3.60%

+2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.75%

8.20%

+4.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.94%

10.57%

+6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.08%

14.21%

+8.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.52%

17.36%

+8.16%

POWR vs. FPWR - Expense Ratio Comparison

POWR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FPWR's 0.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

POWR vs. FPWR - Dividend Comparison

POWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than FPWR's 1.80% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPWR
First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF		1.80%1.97%2.52%2.54%1.72%1.66%1.68%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
POWR
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF		5.48%7.56%4.36%4.16%4.82%3.94%3.96%5.71%3.17%3.11%2.75%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

POWR and FPWR have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POWR has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to FPWR (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWR dropped -65.98% vs FPWR's -32.28%.

On 5-year performance, POWR leads with 14.68% vs 12.46% for FPWR. On fees, POWR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, FPWR has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, POWR has performed better with a 14.68% return vs 12.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

POWR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for FPWR.

POWR has the higher dividend yield at 5.48%, compared with 1.80% for FPWR.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWR and 0.96% for FPWR.

FPWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POWR and FPWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer