POWL vs. CRS
POWL (Powell Industries, Inc.) and CRS (Carpenter Technology Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — POWL in Electrical Equipment & Parts, CRS in Metal Fabrication. Over the past 10 years, POWL returned 40.56%/yr vs 35.01%/yr for CRS. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
POWL vs. CRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWL achieves a 177.61% return, which is significantly higher than CRS's 78.53% return. Over the past 10 years, POWL has outperformed CRS with an annualized return of 40.56%, while CRS has yielded a comparatively lower 35.01% annualized return.
POWL
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 177.61%
- 6M
- 162.55%
- 1Y
- 372.00%
- 3Y*
- 146.47%
- 5Y*
- 94.19%
- 10Y*
- 40.56%
CRS
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 37.31%
- YTD
- 78.53%
- 6M
- 74.76%
- 1Y
- 126.36%
- 3Y*
- 121.69%
- 5Y*
- 68.28%
- 10Y*
- 35.01%
POWL vs. CRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 177.61% | 44.49% | 152.21% | 155.62% | 24.34% | 3.60% | -37.60% | 101.58% | -9.92% | -24.00% |
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 78.53% | 86.23% | 141.72% | 94.48% | 29.50% | 2.66% | -39.44% | 42.12% | -29.16% | 43.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWL and CRS is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.28 |
The correlation between POWL and CRS shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.43 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
POWL:
$10.77B
CRS:
$28.24B
POWL:
$5.12
CRS:
$9.51
POWL:
57.59
CRS:
59.07
POWL:
0.09
CRS:
0.05
POWL:
9.51
CRS:
9.34
POWL:
15.19
CRS:
13.66
POWL:
$1.13B
CRS:
$3.03B
POWL:
$340.78M
CRS:
$900.50M
POWL:
$236.11M
CRS:
$745.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWL vs. CRS — Risk / Return Rank
POWL
CRS
POWL vs. CRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) and Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POWL | CRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.44 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.71 | 6.68 | +5.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 36.97 | 15.72 | +21.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POWL vs. CRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWL drawdown since its inception was -73.10%, smaller than the maximum CRS drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWL and CRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWL | CRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.10% | -84.68% | +11.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.88% | -19.08% | -11.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.76% | -28.74% | -27.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.76% | -41.86% | -13.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.85% | -74.70% | +5.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.45% | -0.17% | -8.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.09% | -27.23% | -8.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.76% | 8.09% | +1.67% |
Volatility
POWL vs. CRS - Volatility Comparison
Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) has a higher volatility of 19.86% compared to Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) at 12.83%. This indicates that POWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWL | CRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.86% | 12.83% | +7.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.83% | 33.92% | +10.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.91% | 48.29% | +11.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.36% | 46.70% | +17.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.84% | 48.88% | +5.96% |
Dividends
POWL vs. CRS - Dividend Comparison
POWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than CRS's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 0.14% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 1.13% | 2.17% | 2.74% | 2.75% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 1.41% | 1.99% | 2.38% |
POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 0.12% | 0.34% | 0.48% | 1.19% | 2.96% | 3.53% | 3.53% | 2.12% | 4.16% | 3.63% | 2.67% | 4.00% |
Financials
POWL vs. CRS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Powell Industries, Inc. and Carpenter Technology Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
POWL vs. CRS - Profitability Comparison
POWL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 87.94M and revenue of 296.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.
CRS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 251.80M and revenue of 811.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.
POWL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.58M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.
CRS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 186.50M and revenue of 811.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.
POWL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 45.89M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
CRS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a net income of 139.60M and revenue of 811.50M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
POWL and CRS have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POWL has higher volatility (19.86%) compared to CRS (12.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWL dropped -73.10% vs CRS's -84.68%.
POWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.03 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POWL and CRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer