POWA vs. SPHD
POWA (Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF) and SPHD (Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - POWA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Pricing Power Index, while SPHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, POWA returned 10.17%/yr vs 7.55%/yr for SPHD. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. POWA charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SPHD.
Performance
POWA vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWA achieves a -3.46% return, which is significantly lower than SPHD's 8.20% return. Over the past 10 years, POWA has outperformed SPHD with an annualized return of 10.17%, while SPHD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.55% annualized return.
POWA
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- -3.46%
- 6M
- -4.44%
- 1Y
- 2.51%
- 3Y*
- 9.97%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
SPHD
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 8.20%
- 6M
- 8.56%
- 1Y
- 12.09%
- 3Y*
- 12.70%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 7.55%
POWA vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF | -3.46% | 11.71% | 13.18% | 10.58% | -7.67% | 24.93% | 7.61% | 27.98% | -3.96% | 21.52% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 8.20% | 3.41% | 18.08% | 1.32% | 0.58% | 24.98% | -9.98% | 20.26% | -6.17% | 11.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWA and SPHD is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2012 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between POWA and SPHD has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWA vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank
POWA
SPHD
POWA vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POWA | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.18 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 1.66 | -1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.65 | 4.06 | -3.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POWA vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWA drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, which is greater than SPHD's maximum drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWA and SPHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWA | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.91% | -41.39% | -6.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.76% | -7.33% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.00% | -13.29% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.75% | -19.50% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.53% | -41.39% | +4.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.56% | -1.91% | -5.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -4.69% | -1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 2.98% | +0.91% |
Volatility
POWA vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) is 3.15%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that POWA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWA | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 4.26% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.98% | 8.13% | +0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82% | 11.48% | +0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.93% | 14.16% | -0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 17.65% | -1.60% |
POWA vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
POWA has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
POWA vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison
POWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than SPHD's 4.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF | 0.97% | 0.94% | 0.79% | 1.60% | 1.48% | 1.06% | 1.34% | 1.16% | 1.39% | 1.63% | 2.18% | 3.31% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.60% | 4.02% | 3.41% | 4.48% | 3.89% | 3.45% | 4.89% | 4.07% | 4.40% | 3.14% | 3.83% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POWA and SPHD have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHD has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to POWA (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWA dropped -47.91% vs SPHD's -41.39%.
On 10-year performance, POWA leads with 10.17% vs 7.55% for SPHD. On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, POWA has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, POWA has performed better with a 10.17% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for POWA.
SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.97% for POWA.
POWA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPHD is Dividend. POWA tracks Bloomberg Pricing Power Index, while SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWA and 0.30% for SPHD.
SPHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POWA and SPHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer