PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POWA vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

POWA vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POWA achieves a -3.46% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 8.88% return. Over the past 10 years, POWA has underperformed SCHB with an annualized return of 10.17%, while SCHB has yielded a comparatively higher 15.12% annualized return.


POWA

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
-3.46%
6M
-4.44%
1Y
2.51%
3Y*
9.97%
5Y*
7.09%
10Y*
10.17%

SCHB

1D
-1.39%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
8.88%
6M
7.77%
1Y
24.10%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*
15.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POWA vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
-3.46%11.71%13.18%10.58%-7.67%24.93%7.61%27.98%-3.96%21.52%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
8.88%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%30.79%-5.43%21.20%

Correlation

The correlation between POWA and SCHB is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.82

The correlation between POWA and SCHB shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.83 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

POWA vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
POWA
SCHB

Technology

27.1%
37.3%

Industrials

18.7%
9.1%

Healthcare

17.7%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

15.7%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

13.9%
9.8%

Financial Services

2.4%
11.4%

Real Estate

2.4%
2.3%

Communication Services

2.1%
9.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.9%

Energy

-

3.3%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Technology

POWA
27.1%
SCHB
37.3%

Industrials

POWA
18.7%
SCHB
9.1%

Healthcare

POWA
17.7%
SCHB
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

POWA
15.7%
SCHB
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

POWA
13.9%
SCHB
9.8%

Financial Services

POWA
2.4%
SCHB
11.4%

Real Estate

POWA
2.4%
SCHB
2.3%

Communication Services

POWA
2.1%
SCHB
9.8%

Basic Materials

POWA

-

SCHB
1.9%

Energy

POWA

-

SCHB
3.3%

Utilities

POWA

-

SCHB
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POWA vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POWA
POWA Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
POWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
POWA Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
POWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
POWA Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POWA vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


POWASCHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.34

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

2.72

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.65

12.04

-11.40

POWA vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POWA Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POWA and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

POWA vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POWA drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, which is greater than SCHB's maximum drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWA and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POWASCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.91%

-35.27%

-12.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.76%

-8.91%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.00%

-19.34%

+4.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.75%

-25.41%

+7.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.53%

-35.27%

-1.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.56%

-2.86%

-4.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.24%

-4.11%

-2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

2.01%

+1.88%

Volatility

POWA vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) is 3.15%, while Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that POWA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POWASCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

5.00%

-1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

10.09%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.82%

12.83%

-1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.93%

17.35%

-3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

18.34%

-2.29%

POWA vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

POWA has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

POWA vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

POWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than SCHB's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
0.97%0.94%0.79%1.60%1.48%1.06%1.34%1.16%1.39%1.63%2.18%3.31%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.04%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


POWA and SCHB have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHB has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to POWA (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWA dropped -47.91% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 10-year performance, SCHB leads with 15.12% vs 10.17% for POWA. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, POWA has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 15.12% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for POWA.

SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.97% for POWA.

POWA tracks Bloomberg Pricing Power Index, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWA and 0.03% for SCHB.

SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POWA and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer