POWA vs. QMAR
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR).
POWA and QMAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. POWA is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Pricing Power Index. It was launched on Dec 15, 2006. QMAR is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Mar 19, 2021.
Performance
POWA vs. QMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
POWA vs. QMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF | -4.22% | 11.71% | 13.18% | 10.58% | -7.67% | 23.21% |
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March | 1.87% | 10.89% | 16.11% | 35.47% | -16.56% | 12.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWA achieves a -4.22% return, which is significantly lower than QMAR's 1.87% return.
POWA
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -7.55%
- YTD
- -4.22%
- 6M
- -3.94%
- 1Y
- 5.85%
- 3Y*
- 9.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
QMAR
- 1D
- 2.41%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 4.47%
- 1Y
- 18.84%
- 3Y*
- 14.87%
- 5Y*
- 10.44%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
POWA vs. QMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
POWA has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAR's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
POWA vs. QMAR — Risk / Return Rank
POWA
QMAR
POWA vs. QMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POWA | QMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.39 | 1.43 | -1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.67 | 2.27 | -1.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.46 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 2.03 | -1.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | 14.07 | -11.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POWA | QMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 1.43 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.75 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.76 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between POWA and QMAR is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
POWA vs. QMAR - Dividend Comparison
POWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while QMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF | 0.98% | 0.94% | 0.79% | 1.60% | 1.48% | 1.06% | 1.34% | 1.16% | 1.39% | 1.63% | 2.18% | 3.31% |
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
POWA vs. QMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWA drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, which is greater than QMAR's maximum drawdown of -19.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWA and QMAR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWA | QMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.91% | -19.83% | -28.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.77% | -9.23% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.75% | -19.83% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.29% | -0.88% | -7.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -3.40% | -2.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 1.33% | +1.37% |
Volatility
POWA vs. QMAR - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) at 3.50%. This indicates that POWA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| POWA | QMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 3.50% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 4.62% | +4.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.26% | 13.25% | +2.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 14.05% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 14.03% | +1.98% |