PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POWA vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

POWA vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POWA achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.25% return. Over the past 10 years, POWA has underperformed ITOT with an annualized return of 10.28%, while ITOT has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.


POWA

1D
0.04%
1M
0.44%
YTD
-2.29%
6M
-2.55%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
10.86%
5Y*
7.41%
10Y*
10.28%

ITOT

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.25%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POWA vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
-2.29%11.71%13.18%10.58%-7.67%24.93%7.61%27.98%-3.96%21.52%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.25%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-5.33%21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between POWA and ITOT is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2006

0.81

The correlation between POWA and ITOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

POWA vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
POWA
ITOT

Technology

25.3%
33.8%

Industrials

19.0%
9.5%

Healthcare

18.4%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

16.1%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

14.8%
10.1%

Financial Services

2.3%
12.1%

Real Estate

2.2%
2.4%

Communication Services

2.0%
10.3%

Basic Materials

-

2.1%

Energy

-

3.7%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

POWA
25.3%
ITOT
33.8%

Industrials

POWA
19.0%
ITOT
9.5%

Healthcare

POWA
18.4%
ITOT
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

POWA
16.1%
ITOT
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

POWA
14.8%
ITOT
10.1%

Financial Services

POWA
2.3%
ITOT
12.1%

Real Estate

POWA
2.2%
ITOT
2.4%

Communication Services

POWA
2.0%
ITOT
10.3%

Basic Materials

POWA

-

ITOT
2.1%

Energy

POWA

-

ITOT
3.7%

Utilities

POWA

-

ITOT
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POWA vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POWA
POWA Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
POWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
POWA Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
POWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
POWA Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POWA vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


POWAITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.42

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

3.17

-2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.18

14.57

-13.39

POWA vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POWA Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POWA and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


POWAITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

2.32

-1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.74

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.82

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.57

-0.03

Drawdowns

POWA vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POWA drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWA and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POWAITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.91%

-55.20%

+7.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.76%

-8.90%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.00%

-19.44%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.75%

-25.36%

+7.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.53%

-35.00%

-1.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.44%

-0.73%

-5.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.24%

-6.97%

+0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

1.94%

+1.65%

Volatility

POWA vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) have volatilities of 3.12% and 2.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POWAITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

2.99%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.80%

9.13%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.73%

12.20%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.92%

17.36%

-3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

18.26%

-2.21%

POWA vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

POWA has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

POWA vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

POWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than ITOT's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.98%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
0.96%0.94%0.79%1.60%1.48%1.06%1.34%1.16%1.39%1.63%2.18%3.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


POWA and ITOT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POWA has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWA dropped -47.91% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 10-year performance, ITOT leads with 15.01% vs 10.28% for POWA. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 15.01% return vs 10.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for POWA.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.96% for POWA.

POWA tracks Bloomberg Pricing Power Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWA and 0.03% for ITOT.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POWA and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer