POWA vs. ITOT
POWA (Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - POWA tracks the Bloomberg Pricing Power Index while ITOT tracks the S&P Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, POWA returned 10.28%/yr vs 15.01%/yr for ITOT. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. POWA charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
POWA vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWA achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.25% return. Over the past 10 years, POWA has underperformed ITOT with an annualized return of 10.28%, while ITOT has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.
POWA
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- -2.29%
- 6M
- -2.55%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- 10.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
ITOT
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
POWA vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF | -2.29% | 11.71% | 13.18% | 10.58% | -7.67% | 24.93% | 7.61% | 27.98% | -3.96% | 21.52% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 11.25% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -19.47% | 25.68% | 20.71% | 30.67% | -5.33% | 21.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWA and ITOT is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2006 | 0.81 |
The correlation between POWA and ITOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
POWA vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
POWA
ITOT
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
POWA
ITOT
Industrials
POWA
ITOT
Healthcare
POWA
ITOT
Consumer Defensive
POWA
ITOT
Consumer Cyclical
POWA
ITOT
Financial Services
POWA
ITOT
Real Estate
POWA
ITOT
Communication Services
POWA
ITOT
Basic Materials
POWA
-
ITOT
Energy
POWA
-
ITOT
Utilities
POWA
-
ITOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWA vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
POWA
ITOT
POWA vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POWA | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.42 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 3.17 | -2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.18 | 14.57 | -13.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POWA | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | 2.32 | -1.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.74 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.82 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.57 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
POWA vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWA drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWA and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWA | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.91% | -55.20% | +7.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.76% | -8.90% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.00% | -19.44% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.75% | -25.36% | +7.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.53% | -35.00% | -1.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.44% | -0.73% | -5.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -6.97% | +0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 1.94% | +1.65% |
Volatility
POWA vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) have volatilities of 3.12% and 2.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWA | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 2.99% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.80% | 9.13% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.73% | 12.20% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 17.36% | -3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 18.26% | -2.21% |
POWA vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
POWA has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
POWA vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
POWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than ITOT's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF | 0.96% | 0.94% | 0.79% | 1.60% | 1.48% | 1.06% | 1.34% | 1.16% | 1.39% | 1.63% | 2.18% | 3.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POWA and ITOT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POWA has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWA dropped -47.91% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 10-year performance, ITOT leads with 15.01% vs 10.28% for POWA. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 15.01% return vs 10.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for POWA.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.96% for POWA.
POWA tracks Bloomberg Pricing Power Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWA and 0.03% for ITOT.
ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POWA and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer