POW vs. VXUS
POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. POW is actively managed, while VXUS is passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. POW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
POW vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POW achieves a 35.68% return, which is significantly higher than VXUS's 12.04% return.
POW
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- -13.79%
- 6M
- 25.01%
- YTD
- 35.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -2.53%
- 6M
- 7.54%
- YTD
- 12.04%
- 1Y
- 25.31%
- 3Y*
- 17.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.68%
- 10Y*
- 9.44%
POW vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 35.68% | -1.70% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 12.04% | 1.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between POW and VXUS is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POW vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VXUS
POW vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POW | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.25 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POW vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POW drawdown since its inception was -20.28%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POW and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POW | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.28% | -35.97% | +15.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.28% | -3.45% | -16.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.56% | -8.17% | +3.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.00% | — |
Volatility
POW vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POW | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.06% | 16.63% | +16.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.06% | 16.31% | +16.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.06% | 16.99% | +16.07% |
POW vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
POW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
POW vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than VXUS's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.60% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POW and VXUS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
POW is categorized as Actively Managed, while VXUS is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for POW and 0.05% for VXUS.
Find the right allocation for POW and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer