POW vs. RMRC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) and RMRC (ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. POW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RMRC.

Performance

POW vs. RMRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

POW

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: -13.79%
• 6M: 25.01%
• YTD: 35.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RMRC

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 1.03%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POW vs. RMRC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	7.23%
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF	3.28%

Correlation

The correlation between POW and RMRC is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026	0.41

Return for Risk

POW vs. RMRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

POW vs. RMRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POW drawdown since its inception was -20.28%, which is greater than RMRC's maximum drawdown of -6.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POW and RMRC.

Drawdown Indicators

	POW	RMRC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.28%	-6.57%	-13.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.28%	0.00%	-20.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.56%	-1.63%	-2.93%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	POW	RMRC	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.06%	10.22%	+22.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.06%	10.22%	+22.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.06%	10.22%	+22.84%

POW vs. RMRC - Expense Ratio Comparison

POW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than RMRC's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

POW vs. RMRC - Dividend Comparison

POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than RMRC's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF	0.58%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POW and RMRC in my portfolio?

POW and RMRC have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, POW or RMRC?

On fees, RMRC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, POW or RMRC?

RMRC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, POW or RMRC?

RMRC has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between POW and RMRC?

They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for POW and 0.60% for RMRC.