POW vs. IXC
POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. POW is actively managed, while IXC is passively managed. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. POW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.
Performance
POW vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POW achieves a 38.73% return, which is significantly higher than IXC's 29.15% return.
POW
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -6.03%
- 6M
- 18.68%
- YTD
- 38.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IXC
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- 8.66%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- YTD
- 29.15%
- 1Y
- 38.58%
- 3Y*
- 15.12%
- 5Y*
- 21.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $59.04M | $69.94M | $60.17M | |
| $1.11M | $2.15M | $2.58M |
POW vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 38.73% | -1.70% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 29.15% | 2.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between POW and IXC is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POW vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IXC
POW vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POW | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.76 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POW vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POW drawdown since its inception was -28.02%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POW and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POW | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.02% | -67.88% | +39.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.49% | -7.05% | -11.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.73% | -17.42% | +11.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.98% | — |
Volatility
POW vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POW | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.40% | 19.74% | +14.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.40% | 23.36% | +11.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.40% | 26.83% | +7.57% |
POW vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
POW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
POW vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than IXC's 2.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.94% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POW and IXC have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IXC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
POW is categorized as Actively Managed, while IXC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for POW and 0.40% for IXC.
Find the right allocation for POW and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer