POW vs. BKGI
POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) and BKGI (Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares, while BKGI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. POW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BKGI.
Performance
POW vs. BKGI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POW achieves a 35.68% return, which is significantly higher than BKGI's 14.63% return.
POW
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- -13.79%
- 6M
- 25.01%
- YTD
- 35.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKGI
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 12.05%
- YTD
- 14.63%
- 1Y
- 23.16%
- 3Y*
- 21.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POW vs. BKGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 35.68% | -1.70% |
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF | 14.63% | 2.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between POW and BKGI is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POW vs. BKGI — Risk / Return Rank
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BKGI
POW vs. BKGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POW | BKGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.78 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.31 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POW vs. BKGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POW drawdown since its inception was -20.28%, which is greater than BKGI's maximum drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POW and BKGI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POW | BKGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.28% | -14.79% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.28% | -1.04% | -19.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.56% | -2.56% | -2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.05% | — |
Volatility
POW vs. BKGI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POW | BKGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.06% | 11.64% | +21.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.06% | 13.99% | +19.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.06% | 13.99% | +19.07% |
POW vs. BKGI - Expense Ratio Comparison
POW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BKGI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
POW vs. BKGI - Dividend Comparison
POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than BKGI's 2.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF | 2.88% | 2.65% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 0.53% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POW and BKGI have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKGI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKGI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
BKGI has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
POW is categorized as Actively Managed, while BKGI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for POW and 0.65% for BKGI.
Find the right allocation for POW and BKGI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer