POSKX vs. QQQI
POSKX (PrimeCap Odyssey Stock Fund) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both funds - POSKX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by PRIMECAP Odyssey Funds, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Over the past year, POSKX returned 50.17% vs 30.41% for QQQI. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. POSKX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.
Performance
POSKX vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POSKX achieves a 22.10% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 13.43% return.
POSKX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 9.11%
- YTD
- 22.10%
- 6M
- 22.48%
- 1Y
- 50.17%
- 3Y*
- 25.06%
- 5Y*
- 15.87%
- 10Y*
- 16.24%
QQQI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 6.91%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 12.92%
- 1Y
- 30.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POSKX vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
POSKX PrimeCap Odyssey Stock Fund | 22.10% | 25.73% | 11.22% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.43% | 18.62% | 19.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between POSKX and QQQI is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024 | 0.76 |
The correlation between POSKX and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POSKX vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
POSKX
QQQI
POSKX vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PrimeCap Odyssey Stock Fund (POSKX) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POSKX | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.43 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.18 | 3.18 | +2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.69 | 14.27 | +7.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POSKX | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.25 | 2.35 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 1.34 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
POSKX vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POSKX drawdown since its inception was -50.18%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POSKX and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POSKX | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.18% | -20.00% | -30.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.99% | -9.61% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.17% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.15% | -2.20% | -3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 2.14% | +0.24% |
Volatility
POSKX vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
PrimeCap Odyssey Stock Fund (POSKX) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 2.68%. This indicates that POSKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POSKX | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.13% | 2.68% | +3.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.66% | 9.85% | +2.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.92% | 12.98% | +2.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 17.07% | +0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.00% | 17.07% | +1.93% |
POSKX vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
POSKX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
POSKX vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
POSKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.47%, more than QQQI's 13.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POSKX PrimeCap Odyssey Stock Fund | 22.47% | 27.44% | 18.13% | 10.14% | 12.13% | 14.58% | 7.85% | 6.03% | 3.03% | 2.17% | 2.93% | 1.92% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.19% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POSKX and QQQI have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POSKX has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to QQQI (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POSKX dropped -50.18% vs QQQI's -20.00%.
POSKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POSKX and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer