PONY vs. GTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PONY (Pony AI Inc) and GTX (Garrett Motion Inc.) are both stocks. PONY operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while GTX operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past year, PONY returned -25.07% vs 224.03% for GTX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PONY vs. GTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pony AI Inc (PONY) and Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PONY achieves a -28.48% return, which is significantly lower than GTX's 86.73% return.

PONY

• 1D: -4.25%
• 1M: -0.29%
• YTD: -28.48%
• 6M: -26.87%
• 1Y: -25.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GTX

• 1D: 2.41%
• 1M: 29.68%
• YTD: 86.73%
• 6M: 94.66%
• 1Y: 224.03%
• 3Y*: 57.45%
• 5Y*: 32.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PONY vs. GTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PONY Pony AI Inc	-28.48%	1.05%	19.58%
GTX Garrett Motion Inc.	86.73%	97.23%	7.89%

Correlation

The correlation between PONY and GTX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2024	0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap PONY : $4.50B GTX : $6.25B
EPS PONY : -$0.35 GTX : $1.72
PS Ratio PONY : 37.75 GTX : 2.38
Total Revenue (TTM) PONY : $110.40M GTX : $2.71B
Gross Profit (TTM) PONY : $17.42M GTX : $855.00M
EBITDA (TTM) PONY : -$247.35M GTX : $452.00M

Return for Risk

PONY vs. GTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PONY

PONY Risk / Return Rank: 28
PONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
PONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
PONY Omega Ratio Rank: 29
PONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
PONY Martin Ratio Rank: 28

GTX

GTX Risk / Return Rank: 98
GTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
GTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
GTX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
GTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
GTX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PONY vs. GTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pony AI Inc (PONY) and Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PONY	GTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.33	4.73	-5.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.02	6.67	-6.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.81	-0.81
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.38	11.35	-11.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.67	36.89	-37.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PONY vs. GTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PONY Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the GTX Sharpe Ratio of 4.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PONY and GTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PONY	GTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.33	4.73	-5.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	0.12	-0.19

Drawdowns

PONY vs. GTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PONY drawdown since its inception was -82.38%, smaller than the maximum GTX drawdown of -93.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PONY and GTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PONY	GTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.38%	-93.08%	+10.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.79%	-19.87%	-45.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.82%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.90%	-4.37%	-52.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.10%	-51.03%	+13.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.39%	6.10%	+31.29%

Volatility

PONY vs. GTX - Volatility Comparison

Pony AI Inc (PONY) has a higher volatility of 16.57% compared to Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) at 14.73%. This indicates that PONY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PONY	GTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.57%	14.73%	+1.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.02%	34.81%	+14.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	78.34%	47.66%	+30.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	119.67%	41.55%	+78.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	119.67%	64.00%	+55.67%

Dividends

PONY vs. GTX - Dividend Comparison

PONY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.

Position	TTM	2025
GTX Garrett Motion Inc.	0.93%	1.49%
PONY Pony AI Inc	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PONY and GTX in my portfolio?

PONY and GTX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PONY or GTX?

PONY has higher volatility (16.57%) compared to GTX (14.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PONY dropped -82.38% vs GTX's -93.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.73 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.