PONPX vs. SLYV
PONPX (PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2) and SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) are both funds - PONPX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by PIMCO, while SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. Over the past 10 years, PONPX returned 4.60%/yr vs 10.65%/yr for SLYV. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PONPX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SLYV.
Performance
PONPX vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PONPX achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than SLYV's 19.47% return. Over the past 10 years, PONPX has underperformed SLYV with an annualized return of 4.60%, while SLYV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.65% annualized return.
PONPX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 7.78%
- 3Y*
- 7.58%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 4.60%
SLYV
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 19.47%
- 6M
- 16.63%
- 1Y
- 41.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
PONPX vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PONPX PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 | 0.86% | 10.96% | 5.33% | 9.24% | -9.14% | 2.51% | 5.73% | 7.99% | 0.53% | 8.52% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 19.47% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between PONPX and SLYV is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009 | 0.16 |
The correlation between PONPX and SLYV shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PONPX vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank
PONPX
SLYV
PONPX vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 (PONPX) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PONPX | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.37 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 4.20 | -2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.08 | 13.96 | -6.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PONPX vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PONPX drawdown since its inception was -13.41%, smaller than the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PONPX and SLYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PONPX | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.41% | -61.15% | +47.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.69% | -9.36% | +5.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.86% | -28.68% | +24.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.41% | -28.68% | +15.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.41% | -47.73% | +34.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | 0.00% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -8.93% | +7.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 2.82% | -1.73% |
Volatility
PONPX vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 (PONPX) is 1.67%, while SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that PONPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PONPX | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.67% | 4.81% | -3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.36% | 11.59% | -8.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.16% | 18.31% | -14.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.85% | 21.97% | -17.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.25% | 23.96% | -19.71% |
PONPX vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PONPX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PONPX vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison
PONPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, more than SLYV's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PONPX PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 | 5.73% | 5.91% | 6.16% | 6.11% | 4.89% | 3.92% | 4.78% | 5.73% | 5.56% | 5.27% | 5.42% | 7.77% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.75% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PONPX and SLYV have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLYV has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to PONPX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PONPX dropped -13.41% vs SLYV's -61.15%.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PONPX and SLYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer