PONPX vs. ICF
PONPX (PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2) and ICF (iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF) are both funds - PONPX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by PIMCO, while ICF is a REIT fund tracking the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index. Over the past 10 years, PONPX returned 4.60%/yr vs 5.99%/yr for ICF. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PONPX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for ICF.
Performance
PONPX vs. ICF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PONPX achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than ICF's 16.93% return. Over the past 10 years, PONPX has underperformed ICF with an annualized return of 4.60%, while ICF has yielded a comparatively higher 5.99% annualized return.
PONPX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 7.78%
- 3Y*
- 7.58%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 4.60%
ICF
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 15.91%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 5.99%
PONPX vs. ICF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PONPX PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 | 0.86% | 10.96% | 5.33% | 9.24% | -9.14% | 2.51% | 5.73% | 7.99% | 0.53% | 8.52% |
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 16.93% | 1.85% | 5.30% | 10.36% | -26.12% | 44.17% | -5.43% | 25.48% | -2.55% | 4.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between PONPX and ICF is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009 | 0.21 |
Over the past year, PONPX and ICF have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PONPX vs. ICF — Risk / Return Rank
PONPX
ICF
PONPX vs. ICF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 (PONPX) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PONPX | ICF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.19 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 1.82 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.08 | 5.18 | +1.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PONPX vs. ICF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PONPX drawdown since its inception was -13.41%, smaller than the maximum ICF drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PONPX and ICF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PONPX | ICF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.41% | -76.74% | +63.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.69% | -8.20% | +4.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.86% | -17.25% | +13.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.41% | -34.74% | +21.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.41% | -40.22% | +26.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | 0.00% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -14.16% | +12.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 2.89% | -1.80% |
Volatility
PONPX vs. ICF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 (PONPX) is 1.67%, while iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that PONPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PONPX | ICF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.67% | 4.74% | -3.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.36% | 10.33% | -6.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.16% | 13.94% | -9.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.85% | 18.95% | -14.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.25% | 20.60% | -16.35% |
PONPX vs. ICF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PONPX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than ICF's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
PONPX vs. ICF - Dividend Comparison
PONPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, more than ICF's 2.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 2.38% | 2.88% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.64% | 1.82% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 3.20% | 3.10% | 4.21% | 3.30% |
PONPX PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 | 5.73% | 5.91% | 6.16% | 6.11% | 4.89% | 3.92% | 4.78% | 5.73% | 5.56% | 5.27% | 5.42% | 7.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PONPX and ICF have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICF has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to PONPX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PONPX dropped -13.41% vs ICF's -76.74%.
PONPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PONPX and ICF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer