PONPX vs. FCNVX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 (PONPX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX).
PONPX is managed by PIMCO. FCNVX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 3, 2011.
Performance
PONPX vs. FCNVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PONPX vs. FCNVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PONPX PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 | -1.01% | 10.96% | 5.33% | 9.24% | -9.14% | 2.51% | 5.73% | 7.99% | 0.53% | 8.52% |
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class | 0.52% | 4.51% | 5.43% | 5.86% | 0.85% | -0.06% | 1.10% | 3.00% | 1.82% | 1.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PONPX achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly lower than FCNVX's 0.52% return. Over the past 10 years, PONPX has outperformed FCNVX with an annualized return of 4.59%, while FCNVX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.51% annualized return.
PONPX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- YTD
- -1.01%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 6.17%
- 3Y*
- 7.22%
- 5Y*
- 3.32%
- 10Y*
- 4.59%
FCNVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 1.54%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- 5.02%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 2.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PONPX vs. FCNVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PONPX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNVX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PONPX vs. FCNVX — Risk / Return Rank
PONPX
FCNVX
PONPX vs. FCNVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 (PONPX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PONPX | FCNVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 3.18 | -1.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.16 | 14.52 | -12.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 6.34 | -5.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 21.58 | -19.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.83 | 84.59 | -76.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PONPX | FCNVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 3.18 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 2.69 | -1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.10 | 2.44 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.82 | 2.17 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between PONPX and FCNVX is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PONPX vs. FCNVX - Dividend Comparison
PONPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than FCNVX's 3.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PONPX PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 | 5.46% | 5.91% | 6.16% | 6.11% | 4.89% | 3.92% | 4.78% | 5.73% | 5.56% | 5.27% | 5.42% | 7.77% |
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class | 3.91% | 4.41% | 5.17% | 4.97% | 1.24% | 0.24% | 0.99% | 2.45% | 2.21% | 1.30% | 1.01% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
PONPX vs. FCNVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PONPX drawdown since its inception was -13.41%, which is greater than FCNVX's maximum drawdown of -2.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PONPX and FCNVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PONPX | FCNVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.41% | -2.19% | -11.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.69% | -0.20% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.41% | -0.59% | -12.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.41% | -2.19% | -11.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -0.10% | -2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.44% | -0.05% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 0.05% | +0.88% |
Volatility
PONPX vs. FCNVX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 (PONPX) has a higher volatility of 1.90% compared to Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) at 0.10%. This indicates that PONPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PONPX | FCNVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.90% | 0.10% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.66% | 0.81% | +1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.28% | 1.28% | +3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.74% | 1.27% | +3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.19% | 1.03% | +3.16% |