PONAX vs. FCFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX).
PONAX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Apr 2, 2007. FCFAX is managed by Frost Funds. It was launched on Dec 3, 2012.
Performance
PONAX vs. FCFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PONAX vs. FCFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PONAX PIMCO Income Fund Class A | -1.42% | 10.63% | 5.02% | 8.96% | -9.34% | 2.21% | 5.40% | 7.65% | 0.21% | 8.19% |
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund | -0.70% | 5.21% | 8.01% | 11.23% | -7.83% | 5.07% | 6.22% | 6.95% | 0.89% | 7.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PONAX achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly lower than FCFAX's -0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, PONAX has underperformed FCFAX with an annualized return of 4.25%, while FCFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.24% annualized return.
PONAX
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- -1.42%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 5.68%
- 3Y*
- 6.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.00%
- 10Y*
- 4.25%
FCFAX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- -0.55%
- 1Y
- 3.04%
- 3Y*
- 6.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 5.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PONAX vs. FCFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PONAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than FCFAX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PONAX vs. FCFAX — Risk / Return Rank
PONAX
FCFAX
PONAX vs. FCFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PONAX | FCFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.48 | 1.21 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 1.69 | +0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.24 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 1.41 | +0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 5.32 | +1.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PONAX | FCFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 1.21 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 1.36 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | 1.62 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.47 | 1.41 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between PONAX and FCFAX is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PONAX vs. FCFAX - Dividend Comparison
PONAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, less than FCFAX's 5.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PONAX PIMCO Income Fund Class A | 5.20% | 5.61% | 5.86% | 5.86% | 4.66% | 3.62% | 4.48% | 5.42% | 5.24% | 4.97% | 5.13% | 7.45% |
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund | 5.61% | 6.10% | 5.76% | 5.93% | 5.00% | 3.65% | 3.69% | 4.62% | 5.05% | 5.85% | 4.84% | 4.95% |
Drawdowns
PONAX vs. FCFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PONAX drawdown since its inception was -13.64%, smaller than the maximum FCFAX drawdown of -16.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PONAX and FCFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PONAX | FCFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.64% | -16.33% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.69% | -2.34% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.64% | -10.49% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.64% | -16.33% | +2.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.24% | -2.03% | -1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.80% | -1.54% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 0.62% | +0.30% |
Volatility
PONAX vs. FCFAX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX) has a higher volatility of 1.88% compared to Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) at 1.02%. This indicates that PONAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PONAX | FCFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.88% | 1.02% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.61% | 1.55% | +1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.24% | 2.63% | +1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.72% | 2.73% | +1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 3.24% | +0.92% |