PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PONAX vs. SAMBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PONAX vs. SAMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX) and Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PONAX achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than SAMBX's 2.76% return. Over the past 10 years, PONAX has underperformed SAMBX with an annualized return of 4.03%, while SAMBX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.54% annualized return.


PONAX

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.20%
6M
-0.53%
YTD
0.03%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
6.49%
5Y*
2.85%
10Y*
4.03%
ALL TIME*
6.16%

SAMBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
2.94%
YTD
2.76%
1Y
5.74%
3Y*
6.57%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
4.54%
ALL TIME*
4.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PONAX vs. SAMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PONAX
PIMCO Income Fund Class A
0.03%10.63%5.02%8.96%-9.34%2.21%5.40%7.65%0.21%8.19%
SAMBX
Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund
2.76%5.88%7.03%11.21%-0.86%4.86%0.41%6.66%0.24%3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between PONAX and SAMBX is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2007

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PONAX vs. SAMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PONAX
PONAX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PONAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PONAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PONAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PONAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
PONAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

SAMBX
SAMBX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
SAMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SAMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PONAX vs. SAMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX) and Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PONAXSAMBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.93

-0.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

8.08

-6.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.57

24.51

-19.94

PONAX vs. SAMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PONAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the SAMBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PONAX and SAMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PONAX vs. SAMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PONAX drawdown since its inception was -13.64%, smaller than the maximum SAMBX drawdown of -24.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PONAX and SAMBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PONAXSAMBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.64%

-24.74%

+11.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.69%

-0.78%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.69%

-2.95%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.64%

-5.66%

-7.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.64%

-20.91%

+7.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-0.26%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.79%

-1.57%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

0.26%

+0.93%

Volatility

PONAX vs. SAMBX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX) has a higher volatility of 1.15% compared to Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX) at 0.27%. This indicates that PONAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PONAXSAMBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

0.27%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.52%

1.69%

+1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10%

2.45%

+1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.86%

2.96%

+1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.22%

3.93%

+0.29%

PONAX vs. SAMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PONAX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than SAMBX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

PONAX vs. SAMBX - Dividend Comparison

PONAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, less than SAMBX's 6.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PONAX
PIMCO Income Fund Class A
4.95%5.61%5.86%5.86%4.66%3.62%4.48%5.42%5.24%4.97%5.13%7.45%
SAMBX
Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund
6.76%7.78%8.21%8.21%5.34%3.03%4.03%5.28%5.15%4.28%4.79%4.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


PONAX and SAMBX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PONAX has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to SAMBX (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PONAX dropped -13.64% vs SAMBX's -24.74%.

SAMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PONAX and SAMBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer