PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POAAX vs. PLSRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

POAAX vs. PLSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Conservative (POAAX) and Pacific Funds Strategic Income (PLSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POAAX achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly higher than PLSRX's 1.18% return. Over the past 10 years, POAAX has underperformed PLSRX with an annualized return of 4.10%, while PLSRX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.99% annualized return.


POAAX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.23%
YTD
3.38%
6M
3.53%
1Y
10.53%
3Y*
8.20%
5Y*
2.48%
10Y*
4.10%

PLSRX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.18%
6M
1.63%
1Y
6.44%
3Y*
7.17%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
4.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POAAX vs. PLSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
POAAX
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Conservative
3.38%9.54%6.07%9.40%-15.03%3.96%10.82%12.14%-4.18%7.80%
PLSRX
Pacific Funds Strategic Income
1.18%7.40%6.04%11.24%-9.67%3.61%9.82%13.65%-2.64%6.85%

Correlation

The correlation between POAAX and PLSRX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2011

0.69

The correlation between POAAX and PLSRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.80 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POAAX vs. PLSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POAAX
POAAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
POAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
POAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
POAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
POAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

PLSRX
PLSRX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PLSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
PLSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POAAX vs. PLSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Conservative (POAAX) and Pacific Funds Strategic Income (PLSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


POAAXPLSRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.25

2.45

-0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.28

3.72

-0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.50

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

3.05

-0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.42

13.74

-1.32

POAAX vs. PLSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the PLSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POAAX and PLSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


POAAXPLSRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

2.45

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.83

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

1.12

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

1.36

-0.61

Drawdowns

POAAX vs. PLSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POAAX drawdown since its inception was -20.48%, roughly equal to the maximum PLSRX drawdown of -19.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POAAX and PLSRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POAAXPLSRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.48%

-19.88%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.88%

-2.14%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.23%

-3.29%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.48%

-13.71%

-6.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.48%

-19.88%

-0.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.10%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.80%

-1.74%

-1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

0.48%

+0.39%

Volatility

POAAX vs. PLSRX - Volatility Comparison

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Conservative (POAAX) has a higher volatility of 1.67% compared to Pacific Funds Strategic Income (PLSRX) at 1.10%. This indicates that POAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POAAXPLSRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.67%

1.10%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.84%

2.10%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.72%

2.65%

+2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.38%

4.01%

+3.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.45%

4.46%

+1.99%

POAAX vs. PLSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

POAAX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PLSRX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

POAAX vs. PLSRX - Dividend Comparison

POAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, less than PLSRX's 5.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLSRX
Pacific Funds Strategic Income
5.61%5.67%5.97%5.17%4.73%4.10%3.84%4.32%4.74%3.87%4.14%4.71%
POAAX
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Conservative
3.71%3.84%4.24%3.39%6.99%4.14%2.89%2.04%12.02%2.18%1.28%3.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


POAAX and PLSRX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POAAX has higher volatility (1.67%) compared to PLSRX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POAAX dropped -20.48% vs PLSRX's -19.88%.

PLSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POAAX and PLSRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer