PODAX vs. POBAX
PODAX (Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Growth) and POBAX (Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Pacific Funds Series Trust. Over the past 10 years, PODAX returned 9.43%/yr vs 5.88%/yr for POBAX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
PODAX vs. POBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PODAX achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly higher than POBAX's 5.55% return. Over the past 10 years, PODAX has outperformed POBAX with an annualized return of 9.43%, while POBAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.88% annualized return.
PODAX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 10.11%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 22.63%
- 3Y*
- 15.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
POBAX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- 5.55%
- 6M
- 5.55%
- 1Y
- 14.29%
- 3Y*
- 10.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.85%
- 10Y*
- 5.88%
PODAX vs. POBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PODAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Growth | 10.11% | 14.76% | 13.49% | 15.95% | -19.68% | 15.37% | 14.99% | 23.96% | -8.79% | 16.35% |
POBAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative | 5.55% | 11.53% | 8.17% | 11.33% | -16.92% | 7.64% | 12.39% | 15.64% | -5.83% | 10.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between PODAX and POBAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2004 | 0.96 |
The correlation between PODAX and POBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PODAX vs. POBAX — Risk / Return Rank
PODAX
POBAX
PODAX vs. POBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Growth (PODAX) and Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PODAX | POBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.44 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 2.83 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.90 | 12.79 | +1.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PODAX | POBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 2.33 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.34 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.60 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.59 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
PODAX vs. POBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PODAX drawdown since its inception was -50.14%, which is greater than POBAX's maximum drawdown of -29.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PODAX and POBAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PODAX | POBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.14% | -29.15% | -20.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -5.15% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.02% | -8.39% | -6.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.99% | -22.33% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.11% | -22.33% | -9.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -3.59% | -2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 1.14% | +0.53% |
Volatility
PODAX vs. POBAX - Volatility Comparison
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Growth (PODAX) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) at 2.03%. This indicates that PODAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PODAX | POBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 2.03% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.02% | 5.09% | +2.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.25% | 6.25% | +4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 11.40% | +8.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 9.88% | +7.62% |
PODAX vs. POBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PODAX and POBAX have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
PODAX vs. POBAX - Dividend Comparison
PODAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.78%, more than POBAX's 2.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POBAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative | 2.89% | 3.06% | 3.68% | 2.67% | 13.64% | 6.84% | 2.56% | 2.31% | 20.06% | 3.22% | 4.32% | 5.46% |
PODAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Growth | 8.78% | 9.67% | 2.68% | 1.34% | 26.52% | 10.54% | 2.64% | 6.88% | 25.73% | 4.01% | 6.37% | 8.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, PODAX and POBAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PODAX has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to POBAX (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PODAX dropped -50.14% vs POBAX's -29.15%.
POBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PODAX and POBAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer