PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PODAX vs. POBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PODAX vs. POBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Growth (PODAX) and Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PODAX achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly higher than POBAX's 5.55% return. Over the past 10 years, PODAX has outperformed POBAX with an annualized return of 9.43%, while POBAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.88% annualized return.


PODAX

1D
0.28%
1M
4.06%
YTD
10.11%
6M
9.96%
1Y
22.63%
3Y*
15.87%
5Y*
6.98%
10Y*
9.43%

POBAX

1D
0.17%
1M
2.52%
YTD
5.55%
6M
5.55%
1Y
14.29%
3Y*
10.62%
5Y*
3.85%
10Y*
5.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PODAX vs. POBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PODAX
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Growth
10.11%14.76%13.49%15.95%-19.68%15.37%14.99%23.96%-8.79%16.35%
POBAX
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative
5.55%11.53%8.17%11.33%-16.92%7.64%12.39%15.64%-5.83%10.46%

Correlation

The correlation between PODAX and POBAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2004

0.96

The correlation between PODAX and POBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PODAX vs. POBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PODAX
PODAX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PODAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PODAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PODAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PODAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PODAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

POBAX
POBAX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
POBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
POBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
POBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
POBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PODAX vs. POBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Growth (PODAX) and Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PODAXPOBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.44

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

2.83

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.90

12.79

+1.10

PODAX vs. POBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PODAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the POBAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PODAX and POBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PODAXPOBAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

2.33

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.34

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.60

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.59

-0.15

Drawdowns

PODAX vs. POBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PODAX drawdown since its inception was -50.14%, which is greater than POBAX's maximum drawdown of -29.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PODAX and POBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PODAXPOBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.14%

-29.15%

-20.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-5.15%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.02%

-8.39%

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.99%

-22.33%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.11%

-22.33%

-9.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-3.59%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

1.14%

+0.53%

Volatility

PODAX vs. POBAX - Volatility Comparison

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Growth (PODAX) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) at 2.03%. This indicates that PODAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PODAXPOBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

2.03%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.02%

5.09%

+2.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.25%

6.25%

+4.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.90%

11.40%

+8.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.50%

9.88%

+7.62%

PODAX vs. POBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PODAX and POBAX have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

PODAX vs. POBAX - Dividend Comparison

PODAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.78%, more than POBAX's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
POBAX
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative
2.89%3.06%3.68%2.67%13.64%6.84%2.56%2.31%20.06%3.22%4.32%5.46%
PODAX
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Growth
8.78%9.67%2.68%1.34%26.52%10.54%2.64%6.88%25.73%4.01%6.37%8.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, PODAX and POBAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PODAX has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to POBAX (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PODAX dropped -50.14% vs POBAX's -29.15%.

POBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PODAX and POBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer