POCT vs. PDEC
POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) and PDEC (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - POCT tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index while PDEC tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, POCT returned 9.66%/yr vs 8.41%/yr for PDEC. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
POCT vs. PDEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with POCT having a 4.58% return and PDEC slightly higher at 4.77%.
POCT
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 5.03%
- 1Y
- 14.08%
- 3Y*
- 11.85%
- 5Y*
- 9.66%
- 10Y*
- —
PDEC
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 4.77%
- 6M
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- 16.62%
- 3Y*
- 12.05%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- —
POCT vs. PDEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 4.58% | 11.00% | 9.54% | 20.12% | -1.26% | 9.46% | 10.40% | 1.38% |
PDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December | 4.77% | 12.91% | 9.46% | 17.43% | -5.95% | 9.59% | 8.45% | 1.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between POCT and PDEC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019 | 0.85 |
The correlation between POCT and PDEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
POCT vs. PDEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
POCT
PDEC
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
POCT
PDEC
Financial Services
POCT
PDEC
Communication Services
POCT
PDEC
Consumer Cyclical
POCT
PDEC
Healthcare
POCT
PDEC
Industrials
POCT
PDEC
Consumer Defensive
POCT
PDEC
Energy
POCT
PDEC
Utilities
POCT
PDEC
Real Estate
POCT
PDEC
Basic Materials
POCT
PDEC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POCT vs. PDEC — Risk / Return Rank
POCT
PDEC
POCT vs. PDEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POCT | PDEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.48 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 3.49 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.48 | 18.03 | -1.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POCT | PDEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.45 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.22 | 0.95 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.80 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
POCT vs. PDEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POCT drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, roughly equal to the maximum PDEC drawdown of -19.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POCT and PDEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POCT | PDEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.80% | -19.31% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.40% | -4.78% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.22% | -10.77% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.22% | -11.53% | +1.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -1.09% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -2.02% | +0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 0.92% | -0.06% |
Volatility
POCT vs. PDEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) is 1.28%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) has a volatility of 1.46%. This indicates that POCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POCT | PDEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 1.46% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.87% | 5.06% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.23% | 6.83% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.94% | 8.91% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.23% | 10.96% | -0.73% |
POCT vs. PDEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both POCT and PDEC have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
POCT vs. PDEC - Dividend Comparison
Neither POCT nor PDEC has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, POCT and PDEC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PDEC has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to POCT (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POCT dropped -18.80% vs PDEC's -19.31%.
On 5-year performance, POCT leads with 9.66% vs 8.41% for PDEC. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, POCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, POCT has performed better with a 9.66% return vs 8.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
POCT and PDEC have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
POCT and PDEC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
POCT tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index, while PDEC tracks S&P 500.
PDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POCT and PDEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer