PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POCAX vs. PLSDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

POCAX vs. PLSDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate (POCAX) and Pacific Funds Short Duration Income (PLSDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POCAX achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly higher than PLSDX's 0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, POCAX has outperformed PLSDX with an annualized return of 7.90%, while PLSDX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.99% annualized return.


POCAX

1D
0.23%
1M
3.46%
YTD
7.88%
6M
7.68%
1Y
18.54%
3Y*
13.49%
5Y*
5.59%
10Y*
7.90%

PLSDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.79%
6M
1.13%
1Y
4.32%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
3.11%
10Y*
2.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POCAX vs. PLSDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
POCAX
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate
7.88%12.91%11.62%13.95%-18.67%11.94%14.65%20.36%-7.41%13.51%
PLSDX
Pacific Funds Short Duration Income
0.79%5.93%5.44%6.68%-2.81%0.17%4.04%5.75%0.75%2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between POCAX and PLSDX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2011

0.18

The correlation between POCAX and PLSDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POCAX vs. PLSDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POCAX
POCAX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
POCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
POCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
POCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
POCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PLSDX
PLSDX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PLSDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLSDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLSDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PLSDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLSDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POCAX vs. PLSDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate (POCAX) and Pacific Funds Short Duration Income (PLSDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


POCAXPLSDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.76

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

4.46

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.42

20.98

-7.56

POCAX vs. PLSDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the PLSDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POCAX and PLSDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


POCAXPLSDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

3.10

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

1.71

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

1.70

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

1.84

-1.34

Drawdowns

POCAX vs. PLSDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POCAX drawdown since its inception was -40.19%, which is greater than PLSDX's maximum drawdown of -7.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POCAX and PLSDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POCAXPLSDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.19%

-7.79%

-32.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-0.97%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.03%

-0.97%

-11.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.92%

-5.03%

-19.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.59%

-7.79%

-18.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-0.50%

-4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

0.21%

+1.21%

Volatility

POCAX vs. PLSDX - Volatility Comparison

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate (POCAX) has a higher volatility of 2.43% compared to Pacific Funds Short Duration Income (PLSDX) at 0.46%. This indicates that POCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLSDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POCAXPLSDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

0.46%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.62%

1.06%

+5.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.32%

1.40%

+6.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

1.82%

+15.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.46%

1.77%

+12.69%

POCAX vs. PLSDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

POCAX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PLSDX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

POCAX vs. PLSDX - Dividend Comparison

POCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than PLSDX's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLSDX
Pacific Funds Short Duration Income
4.46%4.57%5.00%4.01%2.20%2.38%1.93%2.66%2.63%2.20%1.90%2.08%
POCAX
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate
6.83%7.37%2.97%1.68%22.92%8.62%3.11%5.02%22.38%3.85%5.44%6.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


POCAX and PLSDX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POCAX has higher volatility (2.43%) compared to PLSDX (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POCAX dropped -40.19% vs PLSDX's -7.79%.

PLSDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POCAX and PLSDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer