PLSDX vs. NTSX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PLSDX (Pacific Funds Short Duration Income) and NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) are both funds - PLSDX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Pacific Funds Series Trust, while NTSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Over the past 5 years, PLSDX returned 3.13%/yr vs 8.85%/yr for NTSX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLSDX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for NTSX.

Performance

PLSDX vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacific Funds Short Duration Income (PLSDX) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLSDX achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than NTSX's 6.46% return.

PLSDX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 0.79%
• 6M: 0.94%
• 1Y: 3.91%
• 3Y*: 5.49%
• 5Y*: 3.13%
• 10Y*: 2.98%

NTSX

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: -0.87%
• YTD: 6.46%
• 6M: 5.53%
• 1Y: 21.24%
• 3Y*: 18.24%
• 5Y*: 8.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLSDX vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PLSDX Pacific Funds Short Duration Income	0.79%	5.93%	5.44%	6.68%	-2.81%	0.17%	4.04%	5.75%	0.26%
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund	6.46%	18.82%	20.20%	22.70%	-25.84%	22.21%	24.87%	32.03%	-7.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PLSDX and NTSX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018	0.25

The correlation between PLSDX and NTSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PLSDX vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLSDX

PLSDX Risk / Return Rank: 92
PLSDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
PLSDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PLSDX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
PLSDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
PLSDX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

NTSX

NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 50
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLSDX vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Short Duration Income (PLSDX) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLSDX	NTSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	1.63	+1.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.34	2.23	+2.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.68	1.29	+0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.14	2.33	+1.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.45	9.93	+9.53

PLSDX vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLSDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLSDX and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLSDX vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLSDX drawdown since its inception was -7.79%, smaller than the maximum NTSX drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLSDX and NTSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLSDX	NTSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.79%	-31.34%	+23.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.97%	-9.16%	+8.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.97%	-16.82%	+15.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-5.03%	-31.34%	+26.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-7.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-3.02%	+2.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.50%	-6.76%	+6.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.21%	2.14%	-1.93%

Volatility

PLSDX vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacific Funds Short Duration Income (PLSDX) is 0.51%, while WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that PLSDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLSDX	NTSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.51%	5.26%	-4.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.12%	10.56%	-9.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41%	13.13%	-11.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.83%	17.17%	-15.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.77%	18.29%	-16.52%

PLSDX vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLSDX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLSDX vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

PLSDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than NTSX's 1.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund	1.10%	1.14%	1.14%	1.21%	1.36%	0.82%	0.92%	1.42%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PLSDX Pacific Funds Short Duration Income	4.46%	4.57%	5.00%	4.01%	2.20%	2.38%	1.93%	2.66%	2.63%	2.20%	1.90%	2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLSDX and NTSX in my portfolio?

PLSDX and NTSX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLSDX or NTSX?

NTSX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to PLSDX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLSDX dropped -7.79% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLSDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.