PNQI vs. GSEP
PNQI (Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF) and GSEP (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September) are both exchange-traded funds - PNQI is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Internet Index, while GSEP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest. PNQI is passively managed, while GSEP is actively managed. Over the past year, PNQI returned -7.64% vs 11.07% for GSEP. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PNQI charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for GSEP.
Performance
PNQI vs. GSEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PNQI achieves a -10.23% return, which is significantly lower than GSEP's 5.91% return.
PNQI
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 6.64%
- 6M
- -7.45%
- YTD
- -10.23%
- 1Y
- -7.64%
- 3Y*
- 13.16%
- 5Y*
- -0.65%
- 10Y*
- 11.79%
GSEP
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 5.91%
- 1Y
- 11.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PNQI vs. GSEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | -10.23% | 15.56% | 29.44% | 12.51% |
GSEP FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September | 5.91% | 10.56% | 10.85% | 4.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between PNQI and GSEP is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023 | 0.75 |
The correlation between PNQI and GSEP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PNQI vs. GSEP — Risk / Return Rank
PNQI
GSEP
PNQI vs. GSEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September (GSEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PNQI | GSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.37 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 2.50 | -2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 12.55 | -13.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PNQI vs. GSEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PNQI drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than GSEP's maximum drawdown of -10.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNQI and GSEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PNQI | GSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.70% | -10.09% | -49.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.85% | -4.44% | -20.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.15% | -0.46% | -14.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.99% | -0.72% | -12.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.25% | 0.88% | +11.37% |
Volatility
PNQI vs. GSEP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September (GSEP) at 1.24%. This indicates that PNQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PNQI | GSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.61% | 1.24% | +6.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.95% | 4.85% | +11.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.48% | 6.00% | +13.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.00% | 7.50% | +19.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 7.50% | +17.82% |
PNQI vs. GSEP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PNQI has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than GSEP's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
PNQI vs. GSEP - Dividend Comparison
Neither PNQI nor GSEP has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEP FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PNQI and GSEP have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PNQI has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to GSEP (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNQI dropped -59.70% vs GSEP's -10.09%.
On 1-year performance, GSEP leads with 11.07% vs -7.64% for PNQI. On fees, PNQI is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, GSEP has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GSEP has performed better with a 11.07% return vs -7.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PNQI is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GSEP.
PNQI and GSEP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PNQI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GSEP is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PNQI and 0.85% for GSEP.
GSEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PNQI and GSEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer