PNQI vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PNQI (Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. PNQI is passively managed, while GRW is actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PNQI charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

PNQI vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PNQI

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: -10.35%
• 6M: -11.05%
• 1Y: -2.59%
• 3Y*: 16.78%
• 5Y*: 0.30%
• 10Y*: 11.85%

GRW

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PNQI vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF	-0.91%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between PNQI and GRW is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.60

PNQI vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PNQI	GRW
Technology	38.5%	26.6%
Communication Services	30.8%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	27.7%	8.3%
Financial Services	2.6%	9.8%
Real Estate	0.4%	-
Industrials	0.1%	38.1%
Healthcare	0.0%	4.1%
Basic Materials	-	4.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PNQI vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PNQI

PNQI Risk / Return Rank: 8
PNQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
PNQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
PNQI Omega Ratio Rank: 7
PNQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
PNQI Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PNQI vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PNQI	GRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.14	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.07	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.10	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.25	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PNQI	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	13.58	-13.06

Drawdowns

PNQI vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNQI drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNQI and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	PNQI	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.70%	-0.45%	-59.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.27%	-0.27%	-15.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.96%	-0.17%	-12.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.56%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PNQI	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.77%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.87%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.10%	8.89%	+9.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.80%	8.89%	+17.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.29%	8.89%	+16.40%

PNQI vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PNQI has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PNQI vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

PNQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF	0.02%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PNQI and GRW in my portfolio?

PNQI and GRW have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PNQI or GRW?

On fees, PNQI is cheaper at 0.62% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PNQI or GRW?

PNQI is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PNQI or GRW?

PNQI has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between PNQI and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PNQI and 0.75% for GRW.