PNOV vs. AIOO
PNOV (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - November) and AIOO (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. PNOV is passively managed, while AIOO is actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PNOV charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for AIOO.
Performance
PNOV vs. AIOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PNOV achieves a 6.32% return, which is significantly higher than AIOO's 2.48% return.
PNOV
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 6.32%
- 6M
- 6.88%
- 1Y
- 15.23%
- 3Y*
- 10.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.10%
- 10Y*
- —
AIOO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 2.48%
- 6M
- 2.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PNOV vs. AIOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - November | 6.32% | 5.61% |
AIOO AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF | 2.48% | 2.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PNOV and AIOO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PNOV vs. AIOO — Risk / Return Rank
PNOV
AIOO
PNOV vs. AIOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - November (PNOV) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PNOV | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.50 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.66 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PNOV | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 2.88 | -2.05 |
Drawdowns
PNOV vs. AIOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PNOV drawdown since its inception was -18.51%, which is greater than AIOO's maximum drawdown of -0.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNOV and AIOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PNOV | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.51% | -0.74% | -17.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -0.17% | -1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | — | — |
Volatility
PNOV vs. AIOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PNOV | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.13% | 1.98% | +4.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.89% | 1.98% | +6.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.56% | 1.98% | +8.58% |
PNOV vs. AIOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PNOV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than AIOO's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
PNOV vs. AIOO - Dividend Comparison
Neither PNOV nor AIOO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PNOV and AIOO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIOO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIOO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PNOV.
PNOV and AIOO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PNOV and 0.64% for AIOO.
Find the right allocation for PNOV and AIOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer