PMSE vs. PJFG
PMSE (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September) and PJFG (PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PMSE is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM, while PJFG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by PGIM. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PMSE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PJFG.
Performance
PMSE vs. PJFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMSE achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly lower than PJFG's 4.37% return.
PMSE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PJFG
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- YTD
- 4.37%
- 1Y
- 11.29%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PMSE vs. PJFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PMSE PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September | 3.44% | 2.13% |
PJFG PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF | 4.37% | 5.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMSE and PJFG is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMSE vs. PJFG — Risk / Return Rank
PMSE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PJFG
PMSE vs. PJFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September (PMSE) and PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PMSE | PJFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.80 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PMSE vs. PJFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMSE drawdown since its inception was -1.44%, smaller than the maximum PJFG drawdown of -24.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMSE and PJFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMSE | PJFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.44% | -24.24% | +22.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.24% | +4.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -3.80% | +3.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.29% | — |
Volatility
PMSE vs. PJFG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMSE | PJFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21% | 18.00% | -15.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.21% | 20.93% | -18.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.21% | 20.93% | -18.72% |
PMSE vs. PJFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMSE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PJFG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMSE vs. PJFG - Dividend Comparison
Neither PMSE nor PJFG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PMSE and PJFG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PMSE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PMSE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PJFG.
PMSE and PJFG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PMSE is categorized as Defined Outcome, while PJFG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMSE and 0.75% for PJFG.
Find the right allocation for PMSE and PJFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer