PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMSE vs. PJFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMSE vs. PJFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September (PMSE) and PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMSE achieves a 2.77% return, which is significantly higher than PJFG's 0.89% return.


PMSE

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.15%
YTD
2.77%
6M
2.72%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PJFG

1D
-0.46%
1M
-3.64%
YTD
0.89%
6M
-0.39%
1Y
11.00%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMSE vs. PJFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMSE and PJFG is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025

0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMSE vs. PJFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMSE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PJFG
PJFG Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PJFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJFG Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PJFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJFG Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMSE vs. PJFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September (PMSE) and PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PMSEPJFGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.78

PMSE vs. PJFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PMSE vs. PJFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMSE drawdown since its inception was -1.44%, smaller than the maximum PJFG drawdown of -24.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMSE and PJFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMSEPJFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.44%

-24.24%

+22.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-7.44%

+7.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.17%

-3.79%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.18%

Volatility

PMSE vs. PJFG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMSEPJFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28%

17.73%

-15.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.28%

20.98%

-18.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.28%

20.98%

-18.70%

PMSE vs. PJFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMSE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PJFG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMSE vs. PJFG - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMSE nor PJFG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PMSE and PJFG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PMSE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PMSE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PJFG.

PMSE and PJFG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

PMSE is categorized as Defined Outcome, while PJFG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMSE and 0.75% for PJFG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMSE and PJFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer