PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMOAX vs. PLTHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMOAX vs. PLTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Opportunistic Municipal Fund (PMOAX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMOAX achieves a 2.30% return, which is significantly lower than PLTHX's 11.70% return. Over the past 10 years, PMOAX has underperformed PLTHX with an annualized return of 2.49%, while PLTHX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.09% annualized return.


PMOAX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.23%
YTD
2.30%
6M
2.60%
1Y
7.73%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
2.49%

PLTHX

1D
0.51%
1M
5.53%
YTD
11.70%
6M
12.29%
1Y
28.05%
3Y*
19.98%
5Y*
10.55%
10Y*
12.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMOAX vs. PLTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PMOAX
Principal Opportunistic Municipal Fund
2.30%2.91%4.40%6.76%-16.56%6.38%4.40%10.55%1.34%10.14%
PLTHX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund
11.70%19.91%17.18%20.28%-18.52%20.05%16.11%26.46%-9.93%21.32%

Correlation

The correlation between PMOAX and PLTHX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

-0.01

The correlation between PMOAX and PLTHX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMOAX vs. PLTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMOAX
PMOAX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PMOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PMOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTHX
PLTHX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PLTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMOAX vs. PLTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Opportunistic Municipal Fund (PMOAX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PMOAXPLTHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.44

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

3.34

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.41

15.30

-6.89

PMOAX vs. PLTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMOAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the PLTHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMOAX and PLTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMOAXPLTHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.41

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.68

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.76

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.69

+0.06

Drawdowns

PMOAX vs. PLTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMOAX drawdown since its inception was -21.33%, smaller than the maximum PLTHX drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMOAX and PLTHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMOAXPLTHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.33%

-33.26%

+11.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-8.60%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.41%

-16.64%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

-25.49%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.33%

-33.26%

+11.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

0.00%

-2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-4.81%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

1.87%

-0.95%

Volatility

PMOAX vs. PLTHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Opportunistic Municipal Fund (PMOAX) is 1.16%, while Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that PMOAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMOAXPLTHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

3.42%

-2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

9.46%

-7.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.38%

11.93%

-8.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.76%

15.50%

-10.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.06%

15.97%

-10.91%

PMOAX vs. PLTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMOAX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTHX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMOAX vs. PLTHX - Dividend Comparison

PMOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than PLTHX's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLTHX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund
3.91%4.37%4.30%2.76%7.91%3.84%2.91%3.67%3.47%2.37%2.20%1.65%
PMOAX
Principal Opportunistic Municipal Fund
4.51%4.59%4.32%3.42%3.36%3.09%3.28%3.48%3.89%3.62%3.57%3.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMOAX and PLTHX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTHX has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to PMOAX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMOAX dropped -21.33% vs PLTHX's -33.26%.

PLTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMOAX and PLTHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer