PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMOAX vs. CMNWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMOAX vs. CMNWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Opportunistic Municipal Fund (PMOAX) and Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMOAX achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than CMNWX's 8.06% return. Over the past 10 years, PMOAX has underperformed CMNWX with an annualized return of 2.19%, while CMNWX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.88% annualized return.


PMOAX

1D
-0.32%
1M
-1.87%
6M
0.68%
YTD
1.49%
1Y
7.05%
3Y*
3.88%
5Y*
-0.63%
10Y*
2.19%
ALL TIME*
3.42%

CMNWX

1D
1.67%
1M
-1.13%
6M
6.58%
YTD
8.06%
1Y
17.20%
3Y*
19.55%
5Y*
12.95%
10Y*
14.88%
ALL TIME*
14.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PMOAX vs. CMNWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PMOAX
Principal Opportunistic Municipal Fund
1.49%2.91%4.40%6.76%-16.56%6.38%4.40%10.55%1.34%10.14%
CMNWX
Principal Capital Appreciation Fund
8.06%13.27%32.14%25.01%-16.37%27.45%18.36%32.21%-4.12%20.64%

Correlation

The correlation between PMOAX and CMNWX is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2012

-0.05

The correlation between PMOAX and CMNWX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMOAX vs. CMNWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PMOAX
PMOAX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PMOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
PMOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

CMNWX
CMNWX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CMNWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMNWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMNWX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
CMNWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMNWX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PMOAX vs. CMNWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Opportunistic Municipal Fund (PMOAX) and Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PMOAXCMNWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.20

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

1.71

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.60

7.29

+3.31

PMOAX vs. CMNWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMOAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the CMNWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMOAX and CMNWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PMOAX vs. CMNWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMOAX drawdown since its inception was -21.33%, smaller than the maximum CMNWX drawdown of -50.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMOAX and CMNWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMOAXCMNWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.33%

-50.43%

+29.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-8.91%

+6.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.41%

-19.54%

+13.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

-23.35%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.33%

-33.26%

+11.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-2.47%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.76%

-6.92%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

2.08%

-1.29%

Volatility

PMOAX vs. CMNWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Opportunistic Municipal Fund (PMOAX) is 0.89%, while Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that PMOAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMNWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMOAXCMNWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

3.39%

-2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.45%

10.45%

-8.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24%

13.39%

-10.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.78%

16.94%

-12.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.05%

17.20%

-12.15%

PMOAX vs. CMNWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMOAX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than CMNWX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMOAX vs. CMNWX - Dividend Comparison

PMOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, less than CMNWX's 8.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMNWX
Principal Capital Appreciation Fund
8.10%8.75%10.03%0.71%0.69%9.52%5.33%8.37%46.60%7.72%10.32%5.42%
PMOAX
Principal Opportunistic Municipal Fund
4.14%4.59%4.32%3.42%3.36%3.09%3.28%3.48%3.89%3.62%3.57%3.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMOAX and CMNWX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMNWX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to PMOAX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMOAX dropped -21.33% vs CMNWX's -50.43%.

PMOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMOAX and CMNWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer