PLTHX vs. JRLVX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PLTHX (Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund) and JRLVX (John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, PLTHX returned 12.09%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for JRLVX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PLTHX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for JRLVX.

Performance

PLTHX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTHX achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly lower than JRLVX's 11.90% return. Over the past 10 years, PLTHX has outperformed JRLVX with an annualized return of 12.09%, while JRLVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.37% annualized return.

PLTHX

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: 1.84%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 6M: 10.70%
• 1Y: 27.32%
• 3Y*: 18.59%
• 5Y*: 10.72%
• 10Y*: 12.09%

JRLVX

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 1.83%
• YTD: 11.90%
• 6M: 11.63%
• 1Y: 27.09%
• 3Y*: 17.60%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: 11.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTHX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PLTHX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund	10.93%	19.91%	17.18%	20.28%	-18.52%	20.05%	16.11%	26.46%	-9.93%	21.32%
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio	11.90%	19.25%	14.50%	18.00%	-18.06%	18.45%	16.23%	25.03%	-8.29%	17.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTHX and JRLVX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014	0.98

The correlation between PLTHX and JRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PLTHX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTHX

PLTHX Risk / Return Rank: 66
PLTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
PLTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
PLTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
PLTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
PLTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

JRLVX

JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 70
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTHX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLTHX	JRLVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	2.24	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	3.07	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.41	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	3.15	-0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.95	13.66	+0.28

PLTHX vs. JRLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the JRLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTHX and JRLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLTHX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTHX drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, roughly equal to the maximum JRLVX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTHX and JRLVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTHX	JRLVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.26%	-32.53%	-0.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.60%	-8.50%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.64%	-15.27%	-1.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.49%	-25.64%	+0.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.26%	-32.53%	-0.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.69%	-0.38%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.79%	-4.55%	-0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	1.96%	-0.03%

Volatility

PLTHX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) at 4.82%. This indicates that PLTHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JRLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTHX	JRLVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.15%	4.82%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.48%	9.88%	+0.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.68%	11.96%	+0.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.62%	14.88%	+0.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.02%	16.03%	-0.01%

PLTHX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTHX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than JRLVX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PLTHX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison

PLTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than JRLVX's 3.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio	3.18%	3.55%	1.89%	2.24%	8.03%	6.00%	4.26%	8.99%	10.96%	4.29%	3.40%	1.90%
PLTHX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund	3.94%	4.37%	4.30%	2.76%	7.91%	3.84%	2.91%	3.67%	3.47%	2.37%	2.20%	1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTHX and JRLVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, PLTHX and JRLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PLTHX or JRLVX?

PLTHX has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to JRLVX (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTHX dropped -33.26% vs JRLVX's -32.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.