PMJN vs. SPHB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PMJN (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June) and SPHB (Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PMJN is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM, while SPHB is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Beta Index. PMJN is actively managed, while SPHB is passively managed. Over the past year, PMJN returned 6.52% vs 69.40% for SPHB. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PMJN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPHB.

Performance

PMJN vs. SPHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June (PMJN) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMJN achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly lower than SPHB's 30.36% return.

PMJN

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 2.33%
• 6M: 2.88%
• 1Y: 6.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPHB

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 12.37%
• YTD: 30.36%
• 6M: 31.36%
• 1Y: 69.40%
• 3Y*: 29.63%
• 5Y*: 15.19%
• 10Y*: 18.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMJN vs. SPHB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PMJN PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June	2.33%	4.21%
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF	30.36%	32.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PMJN and SPHB is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025	0.74

The correlation between PMJN and SPHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PMJN vs. SPHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMJN

PMJN Risk / Return Rank: 95
PMJN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
PMJN Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PMJN Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PMJN Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PMJN Martin Ratio Rank: 96

SPHB

SPHB Risk / Return Rank: 88
SPHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
SPHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SPHB Omega Ratio Rank: 82
SPHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
SPHB Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMJN vs. SPHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June (PMJN) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PMJN	SPHB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.75	3.16	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.20	3.85	+2.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.97	1.50	+0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.69	6.52	-0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	37.72	25.92	+11.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PMJN vs. SPHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMJN Sharpe Ratio is 3.75, which is comparable to the SPHB Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMJN and SPHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PMJN	SPHB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.75	3.16	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.81	0.53	+3.29

Drawdowns

PMJN vs. SPHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMJN drawdown since its inception was -1.15%, smaller than the maximum SPHB drawdown of -46.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMJN and SPHB.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMJN	SPHB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.15%	-46.84%	+45.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.15%	-10.70%	+9.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.21%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.49%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-0.67%	+0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.08%	-8.50%	+8.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.17%	2.69%	-2.52%

Volatility

PMJN vs. SPHB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June (PMJN) is 0.19%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that PMJN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PMJN	SPHB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.19%	7.14%	-6.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.42%	16.99%	-15.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.75%	22.16%	-20.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.75%	27.38%	-25.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.75%	28.45%	-26.70%

PMJN vs. SPHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMJN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

PMJN vs. SPHB - Dividend Comparison

PMJN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PMJN PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF	0.52%	0.60%	0.80%	0.73%	0.72%	0.91%	1.90%	1.26%	1.96%	1.34%	0.93%	1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMJN and SPHB in my portfolio?

PMJN and SPHB have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PMJN or SPHB?

SPHB has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to PMJN (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMJN dropped -1.15% vs SPHB's -46.84%.

Which ETF is better, PMJN or SPHB?

On 1-year performance, SPHB leads with 69.40% vs 6.52% for PMJN. On fees, SPHB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PMJN has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PMJN or SPHB?

Over the 1-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 69.40% return vs 6.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PMJN or SPHB?

SPHB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PMJN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PMJN or SPHB?

SPHB has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for PMJN.

What is the main difference between PMJN and SPHB?

PMJN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SPHB is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMJN and 0.25% for SPHB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PMJN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.75 vs 3.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.