PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMJL vs. UXJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMJL vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMJL achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.


PMJL

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.61%
YTD
2.63%
6M
3.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UXJL

1D
-0.76%
1M
6.02%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMJL vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMJL and UXJL is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025

0.88

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMJL vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PMJL vs. UXJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMJLUXJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.23

1.87

+1.37

Drawdowns

PMJL vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMJL drawdown since its inception was -1.49%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMJL and UXJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMJLUXJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.49%

-10.29%

+8.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.76%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.12%

-1.51%

+1.39%

Volatility

PMJL vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMJLUXJLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06%

13.90%

-11.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.06%

13.90%

-11.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.06%

13.90%

-11.84%

PMJL vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMJL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMJL vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMJL nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PMJL and UXJL have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PMJL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PMJL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.

PMJL and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMJL and 0.85% for UXJL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMJL and UXJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer