PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMIF-U.TO vs. BLOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMIF-U.TO vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada) (PMIF-U.TO) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMIF-U.TO achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK's 16.21% return.


PMIF-U.TO

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.45%
6M
0.49%
1Y
6.92%
3Y*
6.17%
5Y*
2.60%
10Y*

BLOK

1D
-2.62%
1M
7.72%
YTD
16.21%
6M
7.24%
1Y
30.79%
3Y*
51.34%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMIF-U.TO vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PMIF-U.TO
PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada)
0.45%9.02%3.83%7.22%-6.89%0.89%3.42%7.02%0.69%
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
16.21%32.64%53.12%99.62%-62.36%30.76%90.17%29.54%-25.23%

Correlation

The correlation between PMIF-U.TO and BLOK is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2018

0.10

The correlation between PMIF-U.TO and BLOK shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (5 years) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMIF-U.TO vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMIF-U.TO
PMIF-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
PMIF-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMIF-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMIF-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PMIF-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMIF-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

BLOK
BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMIF-U.TO vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada) (PMIF-U.TO) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PMIF-U.TOBLOKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.16

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

0.87

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.38

1.90

+6.47

PMIF-U.TO vs. BLOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMIF-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the BLOK Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMIF-U.TO and BLOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMIF-U.TOBLOKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

0.81

+1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.28

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.48

+0.11

Drawdowns

PMIF-U.TO vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMIF-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.24%, smaller than the maximum BLOK drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMIF-U.TO and BLOK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMIF-U.TOBLOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.24%

-73.33%

+56.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.22%

-35.64%

+32.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.15%

-35.64%

+31.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.03%

-73.33%

+62.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-10.16%

+9.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.32%

-26.08%

+23.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

16.23%

-15.40%

Volatility

PMIF-U.TO vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada) (PMIF-U.TO) is 1.26%, while Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) has a volatility of 10.59%. This indicates that PMIF-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMIF-U.TOBLOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

10.59%

-9.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.51%

28.55%

-26.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39%

38.29%

-34.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.05%

42.36%

-37.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.71%

38.97%

-32.26%

PMIF-U.TO vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMIF-U.TO has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than BLOK's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMIF-U.TO vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison

PMIF-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than BLOK's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
0.62%0.72%6.00%1.15%0.00%14.31%1.88%2.05%1.30%
PMIF-U.TO
PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada)
3.94%3.96%4.91%4.53%2.82%2.40%2.68%2.38%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMIF-U.TO and BLOK have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BLOK is cheaper at 0.71% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BLOK is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for PMIF-U.TO.

PMIF-U.TO is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while BLOK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for PMIF-U.TO and 0.71% for BLOK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMIF-U.TO and BLOK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer