PMEFX vs. EKBAX
PMEFX (Penn Mutual AM 1847 Income Fund) and EKBAX (Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, PMEFX returned 2.89%/yr vs 16.23%/yr for EKBAX. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PMEFX charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for EKBAX.
Performance
PMEFX vs. EKBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PMEFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -3.78%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 2.89%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.31%
EKBAX
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- -10.19%
- 6M
- 13.30%
- YTD
- 24.22%
- 1Y
- 36.19%
- 3Y*
- 25.13%
- 5Y*
- 16.23%
- 10Y*
- 14.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PMEFX vs. EKBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMEFX Penn Mutual AM 1847 Income Fund | 0.00% | 1.11% | 9.80% | 9.80% | -4.30% | 9.78% | 6.47% |
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund | 24.22% | 21.87% | 21.75% | 22.23% | -13.47% | 19.61% | 13.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMEFX and EKBAX is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PMEFX and EKBAX has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMEFX vs. EKBAX — Risk / Return Rank
PMEFX
EKBAX
PMEFX vs. EKBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Penn Mutual AM 1847 Income Fund (PMEFX) and Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PMEFX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.68 | 1.32 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 3.57 | -4.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 14.57 | -15.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PMEFX vs. EKBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMEFX drawdown since its inception was -13.27%, smaller than the maximum EKBAX drawdown of -55.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMEFX and EKBAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMEFX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.27% | -55.64% | +42.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.19% | -10.21% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.04% | -23.55% | +13.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.12% | -24.84% | +12.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.19% | -10.21% | +3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.19% | -7.96% | +4.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.30% | 2.50% | +2.80% |
Volatility
PMEFX vs. EKBAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Penn Mutual AM 1847 Income Fund (PMEFX) is 0.00%, while Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that PMEFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EKBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMEFX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 6.74% | -6.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.00% | 16.32% | -16.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.48% | 19.75% | -12.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.83% | 18.81% | -10.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.61% | 17.89% | -10.28% |
PMEFX vs. EKBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMEFX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than EKBAX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMEFX vs. EKBAX - Dividend Comparison
PMEFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, less than EKBAX's 7.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund | 7.70% | 9.61% | 5.28% | 6.16% | 12.50% | 6.89% | 2.03% | 9.49% | 7.14% | 6.20% | 10.05% | 11.47% |
PMEFX Penn Mutual AM 1847 Income Fund | 5.89% | 8.73% | 6.16% | 4.41% | 3.25% | 13.55% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMEFX and EKBAX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EKBAX has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to PMEFX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMEFX dropped -13.27% vs EKBAX's -55.64%.
EKBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMEFX and EKBAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer