PMBS vs. MTGP
PMBS (PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund) and MTGP (WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PMBS returned 7.55% vs 6.02% for MTGP. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PMBS charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for MTGP.
Performance
PMBS vs. MTGP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMBS achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly higher than MTGP's 0.21% return.
PMBS
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 7.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTGP
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 6.02%
- 3Y*
- 4.29%
- 5Y*
- 0.29%
- 10Y*
- —
PMBS vs. MTGP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PMBS PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 0.90% | 8.92% | -2.75% |
MTGP WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund | 0.21% | 7.57% | -2.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMBS and MTGP is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024 | 0.85 |
The correlation between PMBS and MTGP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMBS vs. MTGP — Risk / Return Rank
PMBS
MTGP
PMBS vs. MTGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) and WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund (MTGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PMBS | MTGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.24 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 2.39 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.70 | 6.36 | +2.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PMBS | MTGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.27 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.18 | +0.65 |
Drawdowns
PMBS vs. MTGP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMBS drawdown since its inception was -4.35%, smaller than the maximum MTGP drawdown of -16.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMBS and MTGP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMBS | MTGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -16.63% | +12.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.97% | -2.53% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -1.53% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.14% | -5.11% | +3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 0.95% | -0.08% |
Volatility
PMBS vs. MTGP - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.52% compared to WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund (MTGP) at 1.30%. This indicates that PMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMBS | MTGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.52% | 1.30% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.10% | 3.09% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.22% | 4.78% | -0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.88% | 5.79% | -0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.88% | 5.25% | -0.37% |
PMBS vs. MTGP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMBS has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than MTGP's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMBS vs. MTGP - Dividend Comparison
PMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than MTGP's 4.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTGP WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund | 4.32% | 4.19% | 4.05% | 3.02% | 2.47% | 1.64% | 2.61% |
PMBS PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 4.98% | 4.73% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMBS and MTGP have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PMBS has higher volatility (1.52%) compared to MTGP (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMBS dropped -4.35% vs MTGP's -16.63%.
On 1-year performance, PMBS leads with 7.55% vs 6.02% for MTGP. On fees, MTGP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, MTGP has been the lower-risk option at 1.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PMBS has performed better with a 7.55% return vs 6.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTGP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for PMBS.
PMBS has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 4.32% for MTGP.
They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for PMBS and 0.45% for MTGP.
PMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMBS and MTGP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer