PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMBS vs. JMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMBS vs. JMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) and Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMBS achieves a -0.16% return, which is significantly higher than JMBS's -0.47% return.


PMBS

1D
-0.49%
1M
-1.46%
6M
-0.94%
YTD
-0.16%
1Y
3.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.04%

JMBS

1D
-0.42%
1M
-1.51%
6M
-1.06%
YTD
-0.47%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
0.44%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$29.93M$27.70M$29.57M
$4.19M$3.69M$5.46M

PMBS vs. JMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMBS and JMBS is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2024

0.94

The correlation between PMBS and JMBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMBS vs. JMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PMBS
PMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

JMBS
JMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
JMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PMBS vs. JMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) and Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PMBSJMBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.18

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

1.44

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

3.93

+0.27

PMBS vs. JMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the JMBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMBS and JMBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PMBS vs. JMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMBS drawdown since its inception was -4.35%, smaller than the maximum JMBS drawdown of -16.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMBS and JMBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMBSJMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-16.68%

+12.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-3.05%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.59%

-2.61%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.18%

-3.85%

+2.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

1.12%

-0.05%

Volatility

PMBS vs. JMBS - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) at 1.21%. This indicates that PMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMBSJMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

1.21%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.39%

3.48%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.23%

4.30%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.86%

6.54%

-1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.86%

5.50%

-0.64%

PMBS vs. JMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMBS has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than JMBS's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMBS vs. JMBS - Dividend Comparison

PMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, less than JMBS's 5.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JMBS
Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
5.30%5.03%5.53%4.38%2.73%1.16%2.92%3.63%0.89%
PMBS
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund
4.60%4.73%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PMBS and JMBS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PMBS has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to JMBS (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMBS dropped -4.35% vs JMBS's -16.68%.

On 1-year performance, PMBS leads with 3.49% vs 3.43% for JMBS. On fees, JMBS is cheaper at 0.32% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PMBS has performed better with a 3.49% return vs 3.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMBS is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for PMBS.

JMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.30%, compared with 4.60% for PMBS.

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for PMBS and 0.32% for JMBS.

PMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMBS and JMBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer