PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMBS vs. JMTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMBS vs. JMTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) and JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMBS achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly higher than JMTG's 0.40% return.


PMBS

1D
-0.45%
1M
-0.64%
6M
-0.17%
YTD
0.45%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JMTG

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.41%
6M
0.12%
YTD
0.40%
1Y
5.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMBS vs. JMTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMBS and JMTG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025

0.91

The correlation between PMBS and JMTG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMBS vs. JMTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMBS
PMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

JMTG
JMTG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
JMTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMTG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
JMTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMTG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMBS vs. JMTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) and JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PMBSJMTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.24

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.81

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.92

4.98

+0.94

PMBS vs. JMTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the JMTG Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMBS and JMTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PMBS vs. JMTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMBS drawdown since its inception was -4.35%, which is greater than JMTG's maximum drawdown of -2.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMBS and JMTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMBSJMTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-2.78%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-2.78%

-0.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.99%

-1.85%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.15%

-0.75%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.01%

-0.05%

Volatility

PMBS vs. JMTG - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.48% compared to JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) at 1.22%. This indicates that PMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMBSJMTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

1.22%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.33%

2.89%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.20%

3.70%

+0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.87%

3.70%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.87%

3.70%

+1.17%

PMBS vs. JMTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMBS has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than JMTG's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMBS vs. JMTG - Dividend Comparison

PMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than JMTG's 4.32% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, PMBS and JMTG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PMBS has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to JMTG (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMBS dropped -4.35% vs JMTG's -2.78%.

On 1-year performance, PMBS leads with 5.67% vs 5.00% for JMTG. On fees, JMTG is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JMTG has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PMBS has performed better with a 5.67% return vs 5.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMTG is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for PMBS.

PMBS has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 4.32% for JMTG.

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for PMBS and 0.24% for JMTG.

JMTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMBS and JMTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer