MTGP vs. CMBS
MTGP (WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund) and CMBS (iShares CMBS ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. MTGP is actively managed, while CMBS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MTGP returned 0.33%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for CMBS. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MTGP charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CMBS.
Performance
MTGP vs. CMBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTGP achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than CMBS's 0.49% return.
MTGP
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 5.62%
- 3Y*
- 4.36%
- 5Y*
- 0.33%
- 10Y*
- —
CMBS
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 5.31%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
MTGP vs. CMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTGP WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund | 0.37% | 7.57% | 2.48% | 3.96% | -11.29% | -0.64% | 4.91% | 0.05% |
CMBS iShares CMBS ETF | 0.49% | 7.67% | 4.27% | 5.06% | -11.21% | -1.82% | 7.86% | 0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTGP and CMBS is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2019 | 0.48 |
The correlation between MTGP and CMBS shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTGP vs. CMBS — Risk / Return Rank
MTGP
CMBS
MTGP vs. CMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund (MTGP) and iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MTGP | CMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.20 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 1.77 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.93 | 4.90 | +1.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTGP | CMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.16 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.16 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.44 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
MTGP vs. CMBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTGP drawdown since its inception was -16.63%, roughly equal to the maximum CMBS drawdown of -15.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTGP and CMBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTGP | CMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.63% | -15.87% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.53% | -2.44% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.46% | -3.29% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.63% | -15.87% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -1.42% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.11% | -2.95% | -2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 0.88% | +0.07% |
Volatility
MTGP vs. CMBS - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund (MTGP) has a higher volatility of 1.31% compared to iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS) at 1.17%. This indicates that MTGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTGP | CMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 1.17% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.09% | 2.84% | +0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.77% | 3.72% | +1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.79% | 5.31% | +0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.25% | 5.77% | -0.52% |
MTGP vs. CMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTGP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CMBS's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
MTGP vs. CMBS - Dividend Comparison
MTGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than CMBS's 3.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMBS iShares CMBS ETF | 3.57% | 3.45% | 3.31% | 2.97% | 2.65% | 2.46% | 2.83% | 2.74% | 2.70% | 2.50% | 2.29% | 2.31% |
MTGP WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund | 4.32% | 4.19% | 4.05% | 3.02% | 2.47% | 1.64% | 2.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTGP and CMBS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTGP has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to CMBS (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTGP dropped -16.63% vs CMBS's -15.87%.
On 5-year performance, CMBS leads with 0.86% vs 0.33% for MTGP. On fees, CMBS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, CMBS has been the lower-risk option at 1.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CMBS has performed better with a 0.86% return vs 0.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CMBS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MTGP.
MTGP has the higher dividend yield at 4.32%, compared with 3.57% for CMBS.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MTGP and 0.25% for CMBS.
MTGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTGP and CMBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer